ArticleHeliyon2024
Decoding AI ethics from Users' lens in education: A systematic review.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An artificial intelligence application framework for nursing education: a scoping review based on the KAS model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations in the integration of artificial intelligence into education: a novel deep neural network framework for predicting transparency scores.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has witnessed remarkable expansion, greatly benefiting the education sector. Nonetheless, this advancement brings forth several ethical dilemmas. The existing research on these ethical concerns within the educational framework is notably scarce, particularly when viewed from a user's standpoint. This research systematically reviewed 17 empirical articles from January 2018 to June 2023, sourced from peer-reviewed journals and conferences, to outlined existing ethical framework in Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), identify related concerns from user's perspectives, and construct Ethics Guideline for AIED. The finding revealed that certain ethical aspects, including the ethics of learning analytics and the ethics of algorithms in AIED, are often neglected in the existing ethical frameworks, principles, and standards for AIED. Based on the blank between existing ethical frameworks and ethic concerns from user's perspectives, the research proposes more inclusive and thoughtfully Ethics Guideline for AIED. The study also provides actionable recommendations for multiple stakeholders, emphasizing the need for guidelines that address user-centered concerns. In addition, How this Ethics Guideline for AIED could be developed is discussed, along with outlining potential avenues for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.