ArticleBMC medical education2024
Socioeconomic factors and test preparation strategies are related to success on the USMLE Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) exam: a single-institution study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From MCAT to USMLE: how familial background shapes medical student success.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The Wicked Problem of Selection and Competency-Based Education: Applying TRIZ Inversion to the Graduate Medical Education Selection Process.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- GenAI and Faculty Collaboration Support Feasible Development of Curriculum-Aligned Open-Access Board-Style Questions.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Impact of a USMLE Step 2 Prediction Model on Medical Student Motivations.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince the elimination of numerical scoring of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, the perceived importance of USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores in residency placement has increased. It is known that socioeconomic status (SES) and other demographic factors can be barriers to success in standardized assessment, but few recent studies report the relationship between student demographics, including SES, with Step 2 CK scores in the context of exam practice material access and usage. In this study, we investigated predictors of Step 2 CK success across two years at one institution.
methodsA survey regarding Step 2 CK exam preparation and demographic factors was administered to two student cohorts at a New York medical school in 2022 and 2023. The cohorts were comprised of all students in a given class year who had taken Step 2 CK. De-identified survey responses were linked to metrics including Step 1, Step 2 CK, shelf exam, and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores.
resultsThe mean Step 2 CK score among the respondents (n = 213) was 254 ± 13. There was a strong positive correlation between Step 2 CK score and composite shelf scores (rho = 0.80, p < 0.01). Almost all participants used the UWorld question-bank to prepare for the exam (98.1%), and completion of more than 2500 unique questions was associated with better exam performance (256 vs. 252, p = 0.04). On bivariate analysis, students had significantly lower mean Step 2 CK scores if they self-identified as socioeconomically disadvantaged (SED) (250 vs. 256, p < 0.01) and self-reported that financial limitations prevented them from purchasing study resources (249 vs. 257, p < 0.01). In adjusted models, there was no longer a relationship between self-identified SED and Step 2 CK score (beta=-3.50, 95% CI (-8.25, 1.26), p = 0.15).
conclusionsThis study provides insight into the relationship between exam performance, study habits, and demographic factors at a single institution where students, on average, performed above the national mean on Step 2 CK. Results support that Step 2 CK scores are modulated by a high composite shelf score, number of unique UWorld questions completed, dedicated study period length, and socioeconomic inequity.
trial registrationStudy registered with our institutional IRB (IRB number 20177537).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.