Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39391852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Do gifted children without specific learning disabilities read more efficiently than typically developing children?

Laurent Lesecq, Laurent Querne, Julie Gornes, Laura Buffo, Louise Corbel, Anne Gaelle Le Moing, Patrick Berquin, Béatrice Bourdin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurent LesecqDepartment of Pediatric Neurology and Referral Center for Language and Learning Disorders, Amiens-Picardie University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
Laurent QuerneDepartment of Pediatric Neurology and Referral Center for Language and Learning Disorders, Amiens-Picardie University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
Julie GornesUniversity Department of Education and Training in Speech Therapy, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France.
Laura BuffoUniversity Department of Education and Training in Speech Therapy, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France.
Louise CorbelUniversity Department of Education and Training in Speech Therapy, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France.
Anne Gaelle Le MoingDepartment of Pediatric Neurology and Referral Center for Language and Learning Disorders, Amiens-Picardie University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
Patrick BerquinDepartment of Pediatric Neurology and Referral Center for Language and Learning Disorders, Amiens-Picardie University Medical Center, Amiens, France.
Béatrice BourdinPsychology Research Center - Cognition, Psychism, Organizations, PRC-CPO (EA7273), Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There are no published data on the written language skills of gifted children (GC). The objective of the present study was to evaluate reading abilities of GC vs. normative data from typically developing French children (TDC). Like English, French is considered to be an opaque language. Method: GC completed the Wechsler Intelligence Scales and a battery of language tests. Only children with a score two standard deviations (SD) above the norm were included. GC with current or past academic difficulties or specific learning disorders were excluded. The GC's scores were compared with TDC's normative scores for language tests in a chi-square-test and corrected for multiple comparisons. Results: Forty-five GC were included. The highest GC's mean scores were for the WISC's Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and the lowest for the Processing Speed Index (from more than two SDs to one SD higher above the TDC's normative scores). GC were between 1.3 and 4.7 times more likely than TDC to achieve a high score. After correction, the distributions of the GC's and TDC's scores differed significantly with regard to spoonerism, phoneme deletion, and rapid automatic naming ( Discussion: As described in the literature, the GC in the present study had heterogeneous scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scales. The GC performed better than TDC in assessments of the underlying skills of reading and when reading of meaningful texts. This advantage was lost in the absence of context, as shown by the lack of significant GC vs. TDC differences for reading meaningless texts and for spelling accuracy. Hence, GC presented a heterogeneous profile with regard to the underlying skills of reading and reading abilities. The present data should help to improve our understanding of GC's reading skills. In particular, it is now essential to determine which written language tests and which score thresholds are appropriate for identifying specific learning disorders in GC.

Indexed as

gifted childrenpathological thresholdReading abilitiesspecific learning disabilitiesWechsler scales

Identifiers

PMID39391852
PMCPMC11464429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.