ArticleBMC medical education2024
Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching-learning method among undergraduate medical students at gondar university, college of medicine and health sciences: an interventional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Flipped Classroom in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of flipped classroom versus lecture-based learning on academic performance and perceptions of classroom environment among nursing students: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Active learning in diabetes education for health professions students: a narrative synthesis of effectiveness and implementation considerations.Medical education online · 2026Review
- Applying Bloom's Taxonomy to Student Outcomes in a Flipped Classroom Model.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Flipped Classroom During Revision Sessions for Second-Year MBBS Students: A Mixed-Methods Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Pathways and pitfalls: a qualitative study of student experiences in biomedical science education.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Mixed method evaluation of a novel seminar format for a PBL-based integrated curriculum.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Techniques in Orthopaedic Teaching and Learning.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Flipped classroom integrated with team-based learning enhances surgical skills in ophthalmology residency training: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Outcome-based education and student learning in probability and statistics: the mediating roles of engagement and self-efficacy in a new liberal arts context.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Application of BOPPPS and Flipped Classroom Joint Teaching Model into Clinical Practice Ability of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents in Standardized Training.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Effect of the flipped classroom model versus interactive lecture-based learning in undergraduate pediatric education: A crossover study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Integration of Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Extended Reality in Healthcare and Medical Education: A Glimpse into the Emerging Horizon in LMICs-A Systematic Review.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe flipped classroom teaching-learning method has been increasingly adopted in higher education to enhance student-centered learning. Despite its growing popularity, limited evidence exists regarding its effectiveness in medical education in Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess the impact of the flipped classroom method on academic performance, student engagement, and satisfaction among undergraduate medical students at Gondar University, College of Medicine and Health Science.
methodsA quasi-experimental study was conducted involving 100 s-year undergraduate medical students, divided into two groups: the flipped classroom group (n = 50) and the traditional lecture-based group (n = 50). The flipped classroom group received online instructional materials before class, while classroom sessions focused on interactive activities. The traditional lecture-based group attended conventional lectures followed by homework assignments. Data were collected using pre- and post-intervention tests to measure academic performance, the Student Engagement Scale to gauge engagement, and a validated questionnaire to assess student satisfaction. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25, with descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and Chi-square tests employed to interpret the findings.
resultsThe flipped classroom group demonstrated a significant improvement in academic performance, with mean pre-test and post-test scores of 65.2 ± 8.1 and 78.6 ± 6.9, respectively. In contrast, the traditional lecture-based group had pre-test and post-test mean scores of 62.8 ± 7.5 and 74.2 ± 8.3, respectively. Additionally, the flipped classroom group showed higher levels of student engagement mean scores of 4.5 ± 0.8 and satisfaction mean scores of 4.2 ± 0.7 compared to the traditional lecture-based group, which had engagement mean scores of 3.8 ± 0.6 and satisfaction mean scores of 3.9 ± 0.5. Chi-square tests showed a statistically significant association between the teaching method and both pass/fail rates and participation in activities, but not a significant association with gender distribution.
conclusionThe flipped classroom approach proves to be a superior teaching method, promoting better academic outcomes and greater student engagement and satisfaction. This study adds to the growing body of evidence advocating for the implementation of flipped classrooms in medical education.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.