Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39272053›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice.

Francis A Albert, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Hannah M Mason, Emma Anderson, Faith O Alele, Paula Heggarty, Aaron Hollins, Tarun Sen Gupta, Richard B Hays, Lawrie McArthur and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francis A AlbertCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Abdul-Aziz SeiduCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Hannah M MasonCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Emma AndersonCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Faith O AleleSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Paula HeggartyCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Aaron HollinsCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Tarun Sen GuptaCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Richard B HaysCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Lawrie McArthurAdelaide Rural Clinical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5606, Australia.
Bunmi S Malau-AduliCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. bunmi.malauaduli@newcastle.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical education offers the foundational base for future healthcare professionals, with basic sciences playing a pivotal role in providing essential knowledge and skills for clinical practice. However, the long-term retention and application of this knowledge in clinical practice remain a significant challenge. This systematic review synthesised global evidence from diverse studies on the short / long-term retention and clinical application of basic sciences among medical doctors.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across six databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, Emcare, and Informit. The review included studies that encompassed a variety of study designs, participant groups, and educational interventions. The Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool was utilised to assess the quality of the reviewed studies.

resultsA total of 10 studies were included in the review. The findings revealed that rehearsals significantly optimise the retention of basic science knowledge among medical practitioners. Retention varied by discipline, with medical practitioners retaining more knowledge in anatomy (mean scores ranging from 45.0 to 82.9%), while microbiology had the lowest retention score (39.1%). Factors influencing retention included age, gender, and curriculum type. Educational interventions such as targeted courses, integration of basic sciences with clinical skills, generative retrieval and continuous quality improvement in the curriculum were found to enhance both knowledge retention and clinical reasoning. The concept of 'encapsulated knowledge' demonstrates that integrated basic science knowledge helps in synthesising clinical presentations, reducing the need for detailed recall as clinical experience increases. The reviewed studies primarily involved interns and surgeons, leaving a significant gap in research for specialties like internal medicine and primary care/ general practice.

conclusionDetailed retention of basic science knowledge may diminish over time; however, the conceptual framework remains essential for ongoing learning and clinical reasoning. This review's findings highlight the need for specialised educational interventions to improve long-term retention. Continuous professional development and targeted educational techniques are vital for maintaining clinical competence and applying basic science knowledge effectively throughout a medical career. Further research is needed to address gaps in specialty-specific knowledge application and the impact of different instructional methods.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, MedicalHumansRetention, PsychologyBasic sciencesClinical reasoningKnowledge retentionMedical educationMedical practitionersPostgraduate medical trainees

Identifiers

PMID39272053
PMCPMC11396528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.