Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184315›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

High-pressure homogenization to improve the stability of liquid diabetes formula food for special medical purposes: Structural characteristics of casein

Xueting Zheng, Zengwang Guo, Jiayu Zhang, Tianfu Cheng, Hong Yang, Wentao Zhang, Linyi Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xueting ZhengSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, PR China.
Zengwang GuoCollege of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150030, China.
Jiayu ZhangCollege of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150030, China.
Tianfu ChengCollege of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150030, China.
Hong YangLibang Clinical Nutrition Co., Ltd., Xi'an, Shanxi 710065, China.
Wentao ZhangSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, PR China.
Linyi ZhouSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stability of diabetes formula food for special medical purposes (D-FSMP) was improved by high-pressure homogenization (HPH) at different homogenization pressures (up to 70 MPa) and number of passes (up to 6 times). The process at 60 MPa/4 times was the best. Casein had the highest surface hydrophobicity in this condition. The casein-polysaccharide complexes were endowed with the smallest size (transmission electron microscopy images). The complex particles exhibited nearly neutral wettability (the three-phase contact angle was 90.89°), lower interfacial tension, and the highest emulsifying activity index (EAI) and emulsifying stability index (ESI). The prepared D-FSMP system exhibited the narrowest particle size distribution range, the strongest interfacial deformation resistance and the best storage stability. Therefore, an appropriate intensity of HPH could enhance the stability of D-FSMP by improving the interfacial and emulsifying properties of casein-polysaccharide complexes. This study provides practical guidance on the productions of stable D-FSMP.

Indexed as

CaseinComplexesHigh-pressure homogenizationInterfaceMedical foodsStability

Identifiers

PMID39184315
PMCPMC11342877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.