Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139492›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Cutting-edge progress in green technologies for resistant starch type 3 and type 5 preparation: An updated review.

Piengtawan Tappiban, Supajit Sraphet, Nattaya Srisawad, Sulaiman Ahmed, Jinsong Bao, Kanokporn Triwitayakorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piengtawan TappibanInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhorn Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Supajit SraphetInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhorn Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Nattaya SrisawadInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhorn Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Sulaiman AhmedInternational Genome Center, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Jinsong BaoInstitute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Kanokporn TriwitayakornInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhorn Pathom, 73170, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistant starch (RS) is a dietary fiber that resists starch hydrolysis in the small intestine, and is fermented in the colon by microorganisms. RS not only has a broad range of benefits in the food and non-food industries but also has a significance impact on health promotion and prevention of non-communicable diseases. RS types 3 and 5 have been the focus of research from an environment-friendly perspective. RS3 is normally formed by recrystallization after physical modification, whereas RS5 is obtained by the complexation of starch and fatty acids through the thermomechanical methods. This review provides updates and approaches to RS3 and RS5 preparations that promote RS content based on green technologies. This information will be useful for future research on RS development and for identifying preparation methods for functional food.

Indexed as

Food securityHealthPhysical modificationSlow digestionStarch properties

Identifiers

PMID39139492
PMCPMC11321431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.