ArticleBMC medical education2024
Assessing the impact of jigsaw technique for cooperative learning in undergraduate medical education: merits, challenges, and forward prospects.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of the flipped classroom in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Enhancing sustainability competencies: A systematic review of educational interventions for dietitians and nutrition professionals.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning on Short-Term Academic Performance and Engagement Compared to Tutorials Among MBBS Students: A Quasiexperimental Study.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- The power of play-based learning: evaluating the impact of collaborative gamified quizzing on medical students' learning through the lens of Kirkpatrick's framework.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Outcome-Based Self-Directed Learning (OBSDL) in Pharmacology in the Indian Context: A Convergent Mixed-Method Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- The effect of cooperative learning on nursing students' creative thinking disposition and self-regulated learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Mentored Flip-Jigsaw method: enhancing sectional anatomy education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The effects of flipped classroom and jigsaw teaching strategies on learning, retention of course content, and satisfaction among nursing students: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Self-Directed Learning and the Jigsaw Method in Medical Physiology Education.Cureus · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Jigsaw-Based Learning in Medical Education: Students' Perceptions and Feedback.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJigsaw method is a structured cooperative-learning technique that lays the groundwork towards achieving collective competence, which forms the core of effective clinical practice. It promotes deep learning and effectively enhances team-work among students, hence creating a more inclusive environment.
objectivePresent study was designed to introduce jigsaw model of cooperative learning to early-year undergraduate medical students, measure its effectiveness on their academic performance, and evaluate the perspectives of both students and faculty members regarding the same.
methodsIt was a mixed method research, involving eighty second-year undergraduate medical students. The jigsaw cooperative learning approach was introduced in two themes within neurosciences module. Students were divided into two equal groups, with one group experiencing typical small-group discussions (SGDs) in first theme and other group exposed to jigsaw approach. The groups were then reversed for second theme. Following the activity, an assessment comprising multiple-choice-questions was conducted to evaluate the impact of jigsaw technique on students' academic performance, with scores from both groups compared. Student perspectives were gathered through self-designed and validated questionnaire, while faculty perceptions were obtained through focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS v22, while thematic analysis was performed for qualitative data.
resultsThe students of jigsaw group displayed significantly higher median assessment score percentage compared to control group (p = 0.003). Moreover, a significantly greater number of students achieved scores ≥ 60% in jigsaw group compared to control group (p = 0.006). The questionnaire responses indicated a favorable perception of this technique among students, in terms of acceptance, positive interdependence, improvement of interpersonal skills, and comparison with typical SGDs. This technique was also well-perceived within the educational context by faculty members.
conclusionThe jigsaw method is associated with higher levels of academic performance among students when compared to typical small-group discussion. The students and faculty perceived this technique to be an effective cooperative learning strategy in terms of enhanced student engagement, active participation, and a sense of inclusivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.