ArticleHeliyon2024
Rapid detection and quantification of melamine, urea, sucrose, water, and milk powder adulteration in pasteurized milk using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy coupled with modern statistical machine learning algorithms.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Food Fraud Detection Systems: A Critical Systematic Review of the Detection-Prevention Gap.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- FTIR Spectroscopy Coupled with Principal Component Analysis for Rapid Screening of Melamine Adulteration in Brown Rice Flour.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Next-Generation Dairy Systems: From Sensors to Smart Processing.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- A Prospective and Cost-Effective Voltammetric-Chemometric Approach for the Discrimination and Quantification of Melamine and Urea in Milk.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Detection and Quantification of Corn Starch and Wheat Flour as Adulterants in Milk Powder by Raman Spectroscopy Coupled with Chemometric Routines.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for yak milk feeding pattern discrimination: Integrating XGBoost with multidimensional explainability analysis.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Advances in Optical Sensing Technologies for On-Site Detection of Harmful Residues in Food: Principles and Recent Applications.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Concentration and health risk assessment of melamine in commercial citrus juices.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an evident requirement for a rapid, efficient, and simple method to screen the authenticity of milk products in the market. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy stands out as a promising solution. This work employed FTIR spectroscopy and modern statistical machine learning algorithms for the identification and quantification of pasteurized milk adulteration. Comparative results demonstrate modern statistical machine learning algorithms will improve the ability of FTIR spectroscopy to predict milk adulteration compared to partial least square (PLS). To discern the types of substances utilized in milk adulteration, a top-performing multiclassification model was established using multi-layer perceptron (MLP) algorithm, delivering an impressive prediction accuracy of 97.4 %. For quantification purposes, bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNN) provided the best results for the determination of both melamine, urea and milk powder adulteration, while extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and projection pursuit regression (PPR) gave better results in predicting sucrose and water adulteration levels, respectively. The regression models provided suitable predictive accuracy with the ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) values higher than 3. The proposed methodology proved to be a cost-effective and fast tool for screening the authenticity of pasteurized milk in the market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.