Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38863586›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2024

Novel foods, food enzymes, and food additives derived from food by-products of plant or animal origin: principles and overview of the EFSA safety assessment.

Gabriela Precup, Eleonora Marini, Panagiota Zakidou, Elisa Beneventi, Civitella Consuelo, Cristina Fernández-Fraguas, Esther Garcia Ruiz, Marcello Laganaro, Maura Magani, Agnieszka Mech and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Gabriela Precup *European Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Eleonora Marini *European Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Enzymes Team, Parma, Italy.
Panagiota Zakidou *European Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Additives and Flavourings Team, Parma, Italy.
Elisa BeneventiEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Civitella ConsueloEuropean Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Additives and Flavourings Team, Parma, Italy.
Cristina Fernández-FraguasEuropean Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Enzymes Team, Parma, Italy.
Esther Garcia RuizEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Marcello LaganaroEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Maura MaganiEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Agnieszka MechEuropean Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Additives and Flavourings Team, Parma, Italy.
Estefania Noriega FernandezEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Irene Nuin GarciarenaEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Pablo Rodriguez FernandezEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Ruth Roldan TorresEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Annamaria RossiEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Laura RuggeriEuropean Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Additives and Flavourings Team, Parma, Italy.
Francesco SurianoEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Ermolaos VerverisEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.
Yi LiuEuropean Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Enzymes Team, Parma, Italy.
Camilla SmeraldiEuropean Food Safety Authority, Food Ingredients and Packaging Unit, Food Additives and Flavourings Team, Parma, Italy.
Andrea GerminiEuropean Food Safety Authority, Nutrition and Food Innovation Unit, Novel Foods Team, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Union (EU) is committed to transitioning toward a circular economy model, with food waste being one of the areas to be targeted. To close the loop of food waste generated during food processing and discarded at the retail or consumption phases, research and innovation parties proposed to valorize agro-food by-products to produce novel foods and food improvement agents (food additives, food enzymes, and food flavorings). In the EU, the authorization of such novel foods and food improvement agents is governed by different regulatory frameworks. A centralized safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is the prerequisite for their authorization through the so-called Union Lists. Up to December 2023, EFSA published 45 scientific opinions on the safety of novel foods, food enzymes, and food additives derived from by-products of plant and animal origin. The current study illustrates examples of these by-products for the production of novel foods or food improvement agents and the data requirements behind their respective safety assessments conducted by EFSA. In this review, applications on novel foods, food enzymes, and food additives received by EFSA were screened and analyzed to find the common scientific requirements and differences in terms of the safety evaluation of such products. Various by-products (i.e., corncobs, coffee husks, spent grains of barley and rice, grape pomace, pumpkin peels, bovine whey, eggshells, shrimp heads, and animal organs or tissues) were described in the applications as being processed (extraction, physical treatments, and chemical and enzymatic reactions) to obtain novel foods and food improvement agents. The heterogeneity and complexity of these products emphasize the challenge of their safety assessment, depending on the characteristics of each product. However, as this study shows, the scientific requirements underpinning their safety do not differ substantially in the different regulated product areas considered, with similar information needed to assess their safety in terms of identity, production process, compositional characterization, proposed/intended uses and exposure assessment, toxicological information, and allergenicity data. Additional nutritional information and data on the history of use are required in the case of novel foods.

Indexed as

agro-food by-productsfood additivesfood enzymesnovel foodssafety assessment

Identifiers

PMID38863586
PMCPMC11165998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.