Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587606›Full record

ReviewEating and weight disorders : EWD2024

Neophobia, sensory experience and child's schemata contribute to food choices.

Viviana Finistrella, Nicoletta Gianni, Danilo Fintini, Deny Menghini, Silvia Amendola, Lorenzo Maria Donini, Melania Manco

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Viviana FinistrellaUnit of Predictive and Preventive Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Via F. Baldelli 38, 00146, Rome, Italy.
Nicoletta GianniUnit of Predictive and Preventive Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Via F. Baldelli 38, 00146, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6846-1794
Danilo FintiniEndocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-7951
Deny MenghiniChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Science, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-2601
Silvia AmendolaChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Science, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo Maria DoniniExperimental Medicine Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4692-4754
Melania MancoUnit of Predictive and Preventive Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Via F. Baldelli 38, 00146, Rome, Italy. melania.manco@opbg.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6581-975X
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the present review is to analyze dynamic interactions between nutrigenomics, environmental cues, and parental influence, which can all lead to children's neophobic reactions and its persistence in time.

methodsWe reviewed studies available on electronic databases, conducted on children aged from birth to 18 years. We also considered official websites of Italian Institutions, providing advice on healthy eating during infancy.

resultsModern day societies are faced with an eating paradox, which has severe and ever-growing implications for health. In face of a wider availability of healthy foods, individuals instead often choose processed foods high in fat, salt and sugar content. Economic reasons surely influence consumers' access to foods. However, there is mounting evidence that food choices depend on the interplay between social learning and genetic predispositions (e.g., individual eating traits and food schemata). Neophobia, the behavioral avoidance of new foods, represents an interesting trait, which can significantly influence children's food refusal. Early sensory experiences and negative cognitive schemata, in the context of primary caregiver-child interactions, importantly contribute to the priming of children's food rejection.

conclusionsAs neophobia strongly affects consumption of healthy foods, it will be relevant to rule definitively out its role in the genesis of maladaptive food choices and weight status in longitudinal studies tracking to adulthood and, in meanwhile, implement early in life effective social learning strategies, to reduce long-term effects of neophobia on dietary patterns and weight status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, controlled trials without randomization.

Indexed as

CuesFoodAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDiet, HealthyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornFood consumptionFood neophobiaGeneticParental controlWeight Status

Identifiers

PMID38587606
PMCPMC11001701
OpenAlexW4394580297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.