Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38571748›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2024

Harnessing the power of resistant starch: a narrative review of its health impact and processing challenges.

Nathália Trunckle Baptista, Robin Dessalles, Anne-Kathrin Illner, Patrice Ville, Léa Ribet, Pauline M Anton, Mickaël Durand-Dubief

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Traditional MoroccanFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathália Trunckle Baptista *Baking Science and Nutrition, Lesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, Lille, France.
Robin Dessalles *Robin Dessalles EI, Lyon, France.
Anne-Kathrin IllnerTransformations and Agroressources, Institut Polytechnique UniLaSalle, Université d'Artois, Beauvais, France.
Patrice VilleDepartment of Regulatory Department, University of Lesaffre International, Marcq-en-Baroeul, France.
Léa RibetTransformations and Agroressources, Institut Polytechnique UniLaSalle, Université d'Artois, Beauvais, France.
Pauline M AntonTransformations and Agroressources, Institut Polytechnique UniLaSalle, Université d'Artois, Beauvais, France.
Mickaël Durand-DubiefDiscovery and Front-End Innovation, Lesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, Lille, France.
Lesaffre (France) · FRUniversité d'Artois · FRÉcole Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starch is a primary energy storage for plants, making it an essential component of many plant-based foods consumed today. Resistant starch (RS) refers to those starch fractions that escape digestion in the small intestine and reach the colon where they are fermented by the microflora. RS has been repeatedly reported as having benefits on health, but ensuring that its content remains in food processing may be challenging. The present work focuses on the impact RS on health and explores the different processes that may influence its presence in foods, thus potentially interfering with these effects. Clinical evidence published from 2010 to 2023 and studying the effect of RS on health parameters in adult populations, were identified, using PUBMED/Medline and Cochrane databases. The search focused as well on observational studies related to the effect of food processes on RS content. While processes such as milling, fermentation, cooking and heating seem to have a deleterious influence on RS content, other processes, such as cooling, cooking time, storage time, or water content, may positively impact its presence. Regarding the influence on health parameters, there is a body of evidence suggesting an overall significant beneficial effect of RS, especially type 1 and 2, on several health parameters such as glycemic response, insulin resistance index, bowel function or inflammatory markers. Effects are more substantiated in individuals suffering from metabolic diseases. The effects of RS may however be exerted differently depending on the type. A better understanding of the influence of food processes on RS can guide the development of dietary intake recommendations and contribute to the development of food products rich in RS.

Indexed as

fibersfood processinghuman healthnutritional propertiesresistant starch

Identifiers

PMID38571748
PMCPMC10987757
OpenAlexW4393013897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.