ReviewFood science and biotechnology2024
A review on regulatory aspects, challenges and public perception in acceptance of genetically modified foods.
Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From lab to market: industrialization barriers and regulation optimization for new breeding technologies in China.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Risk governance of transgenic plants: bridging science, policy, and public trust.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Advances in Genome Editing for Plant Disease Resistance Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a Gold Nanoparticle-Based Amplification-Free Nanobiosensor for Rapid DNA Detection Supported by Machine Learning.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Understanding chilling injury in postharvest produce: mechanisms, diagnosis, and mitigation strategies.Planta · 2025Review
- Evolution and Future Directions in Herbicide-Resistant Crop Development and Weed Management.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Cultivating awareness: How botanical gardens can foster public engagement with plant pathogens.PLoS pathogens · 2025Review
- Advanced Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensing of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Products.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Genetically modified lipases as biocatalysts for diacylglycerol production in the food industry: a critical review.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Exploring Chinese Consumers' Perception and Potential Acceptance of Cell-Cultured Meat and Plant-Based Meat: A Focus Group Study and Content Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- A Study on Genetically Engineered Foods: Need, Benefits, Risk, and Current Knowledge.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A clear vision for the future of the world's food supply must be developed by all stakeholders, including consumers, farmers, and governments, especially in light of the rapid improvements in the production of genetically modified crops. It has been possible through biotechnology and genetic engineering, genetically modified (GM) crops have been engineered to have certain qualities, such as resistance to pests, illnesses, or herbicides. Concerns about risks and unintended effects of GM crops include ecosystem impacts, new pests or diseases, and health effects on humans and animals. There is mounting evidence that consumers may respond unfavourably to the introduction of genetically altered foods. This research focuses at how genetic engineering can raise agricultural yields, improve nutrient content, and lessen the use for hazardous pesticides and herbicides in food production. Regulatory framework for GM foods may impact on perception and acceptance of consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.