Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322890›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

A survey on puncture models and path planning algorithms of bevel-tipped flexible needles.

Ye Huang, Longfeng Yu, Feifan Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ye HuangDepartment of Medical Information Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering Anhui Medical University, China.
Longfeng YuDepartment of Medical Information Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering Anhui Medical University, China.
Feifan ZhangDepartment of Medical Information Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering Anhui Medical University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous needle insertion is a minimally invasive surgery with broad medical application prospects, such as biopsy and brachytherapy. However, the currently adopted rigid needles have limitations, as they cannot bypass obstacles or correct puncture deviations and can only travel along a straight path. Bevel-tip flexible needles are increasingly being adopted to address these issues, owing to their needle body's ease of deformation and bending. Successful puncture of flexible needles relies on accurate models and path planning, ensuring the needle reaches the target while avoiding vital tissues. This review investigates puncture models and path-planning algorithms by reviewing recent literature, focusing on the path-planning part. According to the literature, puncture models can be divided into three types: mechanical, finite element method (FEM), and kinematic models, while path-planning algorithms are categorized and discussed following the division used for mobile robots, which differs from the conventional approach for flexible needles-an innovation in this review. This review systematically summarizes the following categories: graph theory search, sampling-based, intelligent search, local obstacle avoidance, and other algorithms, including their implementation, advantages, and disadvantages, to further explore the potential to overcome obstacles in path planning for minimally invasive puncture needles. Finally, this study proposes future development trends in path-planning algorithms, providing possible directions for subsequent research for bevel-tipped flexible needles. This research aims to provide a resource for researchers to quickly learn about common path-planning algorithms, their backgrounds, and puncture models.

Indexed as

Bevel-tipped flexible needleMinimally invasive surgeryObstacle avoidancePath planningPuncture model

Identifiers

PMID38322890
PMCPMC10844025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.