ReviewHeliyon2024
A survey on puncture models and path planning algorithms of bevel-tipped flexible needles.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Automatic Path-Planning Techniques for Minimally Invasive Stereotactic Neurosurgical Procedures-A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Flexible intervention workflow for MRI guided robotic prostate seed brachytherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Curved trajectories in stereotactic neurosurgery: is it feasible?Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Study on Bionic Design and Tissue Manipulation of Breast Interventional Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [A multi-constraint optimal puncture path planning algorithm for percutaneous interventional radiofrequency thermal fusion of the L5/S1 segments].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024Article
- Obstacle Avoidance and Path Planning Methods for Autonomous Navigation of Mobile Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous needle insertion is a minimally invasive surgery with broad medical application prospects, such as biopsy and brachytherapy. However, the currently adopted rigid needles have limitations, as they cannot bypass obstacles or correct puncture deviations and can only travel along a straight path. Bevel-tip flexible needles are increasingly being adopted to address these issues, owing to their needle body's ease of deformation and bending. Successful puncture of flexible needles relies on accurate models and path planning, ensuring the needle reaches the target while avoiding vital tissues. This review investigates puncture models and path-planning algorithms by reviewing recent literature, focusing on the path-planning part. According to the literature, puncture models can be divided into three types: mechanical, finite element method (FEM), and kinematic models, while path-planning algorithms are categorized and discussed following the division used for mobile robots, which differs from the conventional approach for flexible needles-an innovation in this review. This review systematically summarizes the following categories: graph theory search, sampling-based, intelligent search, local obstacle avoidance, and other algorithms, including their implementation, advantages, and disadvantages, to further explore the potential to overcome obstacles in path planning for minimally invasive puncture needles. Finally, this study proposes future development trends in path-planning algorithms, providing possible directions for subsequent research for bevel-tipped flexible needles. This research aims to provide a resource for researchers to quickly learn about common path-planning algorithms, their backgrounds, and puncture models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.