Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38249608›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2023

Random cellulose acetate nanofibers: a breakthrough for cultivated meat production.

Ana Elisa Antunes Dos Santos, Jorge Luís Guadalupe, Juliano Douglas Silva Albergaria, Itallo Augusto Almeida, Amanda Maria Siqueira Moreira, Aline Gonçalves Lio Copola, Ana Maria de Paula, Bernardo Ruegger Almeida Neves, João Paulo Ferreira Santos, Aline Bruna da Silva and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Edible Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ana Elisa Antunes Dos Santos *Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Jorge Luís Guadalupe *Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Juliano Douglas Silva AlbergariaLaboratory of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Engineering, Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Itallo Augusto AlmeidaDepartment of Morphology, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Amanda Maria Siqueira MoreiraDepartment of Morphology, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Aline Gonçalves Lio CopolaLaboratory of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Engineering, Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ana Maria de PaulaDepartment of Physics, Institute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bernardo Ruegger Almeida NevesDepartment of Physics, Institute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
João Paulo Ferreira SantosLaboratory of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Engineering, Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Aline Bruna da SilvaLaboratory of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Engineering, Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Erika Cristina JorgeDepartment of Morphology, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Luciana de Oliveira AndradeDepartment of Morphology, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Isabella Paula de AraújoLaboratory of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Engineering, Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overcoming the challenge of creating thick, tissue-resembling muscle constructs is paramount in the field of cultivated meat production. This study investigates the remarkable potential of random cellulose acetate nanofibers (CAN) as a transformative scaffold for muscle tissue engineering (MTE), specifically in the context of cultivated meat applications. Through a comparative analysis between random and aligned CAN, utilizing C2C12 and H9c2 myoblasts, we unveil the unparalleled capabilities of random CAN in facilitating muscle differentiation, independent of differentiation media, by exploiting the YAP/TAZ-related mechanotransduction pathway. In addition, we have successfully developed a novel process for stacking cell-loaded CAN sheets, enabling the production of a three-dimensional meat product. C2C12 and H9c2 loaded CAN sheets were stacked (up to four layers) to form a ~300-400 μm thick tissue 2 cm in length, organized in a mesh of uniaxial aligned cells. To further demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology for cultivated meat purposes, we have generated thick and viable constructs using chicken muscle satellite cells (cSCs) and random CAN. This groundbreaking discovery offers a cost-effective and biomimetic solution for cultivating and differentiating muscle cells, forging a crucial link between tissue engineering and the pursuit of sustainable and affordable cultivated meat production.

Indexed as

cellulose acetatecultivated meatmuscle tissue engineeringnanofiberscaffold

Identifiers

PMID38249608
PMCPMC10796801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.