Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229861›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2024

Trends in Hybrid Cultured Meat Manufacturing Technology to Improve Sensory Characteristics.

Amm Nurul Alam, Chan-Jin Kim, So-Hee Kim, Swati Kumari, Seung-Yun Lee, Young-Hwa Hwang, Seon-Tea Joo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amm Nurul AlamDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3153-3718
Chan-Jin KimDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5020-6873
So-Hee KimDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-6160
Swati KumariDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9929-6758
Seung-Yun LeeDivision of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-6517
Young-Hwa HwangInstitute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3687-3535
Seon-Tea JooDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5483-2828
Gyeongsang National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The projected growth of global meat production over the next decade is attributed to rising income levels and population expansion. One potentially more pragmatic approach to mitigating the adverse externalities associated with meat production involves implementing alterations to the production process, such as transitioning to cultured meat, hybrid cultured meat, and meat alternatives. Cultured meat (CM) is derived from animal stem cells and undergoes a growth and division process that closely resembles the natural

Indexed as

alternative proteincultured meathybrid cultured meatscaffolding

Identifiers

PMID38229861
PMCPMC10789553
OpenAlexW4390008030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.