Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223502›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

The House Cup: Using Longitudinal Gamification to Improve Didactic Attendance.

Brian P Elliott, Joseph Glendening, Sahana Venkatesh, Ammar Ahmad, James Prister, Kathryn M Burtson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian P ElliottInternal Medicine, Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Dayton, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-764X
Joseph GlendeningInternal Medicine, Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Dayton, OH, USA.
Sahana VenkateshInternal Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA.
Ammar AhmadInternal Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA.
James PristerInternal Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Kathryn M BurtsonInternal Medicine, Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Dayton, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1259-833X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine if a point-based attendance system combined with longitudinal gamification is feasible and improves didactic session attendance and learner perceptions at our internal medicine residency.

methodsA prospective before-after cohort study. Weekly attendance was tracked from June 2022 through April 2023 at our university-affiliated internal medicine residency program. We implemented a point-based longitudinal game incentivizing residents to attend didactics with positive reinforcement in July 2022 (C: carrot). We added tiered positive reinforcement and positive punishment to the game in January 2023 (CS: carrot and stick). Attendance during these periods was compared to pre (P) and postintervention (S). Perceptions were assessed during the P, C, and CS periods with Likert scale ratings.

resultsCS was associated with higher attendance than other study periods (

conclusionsA point-based attendance system combined with a longitudinal game that included tiered positive reinforcement and positive punishment was feasible and associated with higher didactic attendance but not associated with changes in resident perceptions.

Indexed as

didactic attendanceGamificationgraduate medical educationinternal medicine residencynoon conference

Identifiers

PMID38223502
PMCPMC10785740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.