ReviewFood science and biotechnology2024
Current status of the novel food ingredient safety evaluation system.
Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cascade Valorisation of Lemon Processing Residues (Part II): Integrated Biorefinery Design, Circular Economy, and Techno-Economic Feasibility.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Biosurfactants in Food: Advances, Innovative Applications and Functional Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Trends in the recognition system and safety assessments of novel foods in Korea.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- The novel food evaluation process delays access to food innovation in the European Union.NPJ science of food · 2025Review
- A study on safety evaluation system of cultured foods among alternative proteins.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Dairy, Plant, and Novel Proteins: Scientific and Technological Aspects.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing demand for new foods, technological development, and vegan market growth have led to an increase in new food ingredients, so the need for safety assessment of these ingredients is important. Representative safety assessment systems are the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) notification of the Food and Drug Administration in the USA and the novel food system of the European Food Safety Authority in the European Union. GRAS is a notification system for information on food ingredients, food additives and functional foods under the responsibility of the applicant, while the novel food system assesses the safety of food ingredients excluding food additives. In Korea, a safety evaluation system is established for temporary food ingredients, which includes food ingredients without a domestic intake history. However, safety assessment systems for novel foods from other countries and food ingredients produced by the application of new technology need to be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.