Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38076269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

A blended learning approach for teaching thoracic radiology to medical students: a proof-of-concept study.

Fabian Stoehr, Yang Yang, Lukas Müller, Phyllis Gerstenmeier, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos, Pavel Dietz, Andreas Weimer, Michael Ludwig, Roman Kloeckner, Johannes Matthias Weimer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian Stoehr *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Yang Yang *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lukas MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Phyllis GerstenmeierDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel Pinto Dos SantosInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Pavel DietzInstitute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Andreas WeimerCenter of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael LudwigDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Hospital of the German Armed Forces Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Roman Kloeckner *Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Johannes Matthias Weimer *Rudolf Frey Lernklinik, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEBundeswehrUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The best way to impart knowledge to medical students is still unclear. Therefore, we designed a blended learning course in thoracic radiology including both "traditional" in-class time as well as online learning modules. The aims were (1) to investigate students' attitudes toward this blended learning approach; and (2) to test whether it improved their knowledge about thoracic radiology. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at the local medical center; 156 fourth-year medical students completed this study. Before and after the course, students had to complete (1) questionnaires to investigate their attitudes (7-point Likert scale); and (2) an objective test to assess their knowledge (multiple-choice/free text questions; results as % of correct answers). Results: Regarding (1), the course led to an improvement in all items compared to baseline, exemplary: interest in thoracic radiology (precourse 4.2 vs. 5.4 postcourse) and the fulfillment of students' expressed requirements regarding the teaching content (4.5 precourse vs. 6.2 postcourse). Furthermore, the great majority (88%) of our participants wished for more online learning offerings in the future. Regarding (2), the course led to improved knowledge on the objective test (precourse: 40% vs. postcourse: 63% correct answers). Conclusion: This feasibility study showed the successful design and implementation of a blended learning approach in thoracic radiology. Furthermore, it revealed medical students' positive attitudes toward this approach and showed an increased knowledge in thoracic radiology. Thus, such approaches might be used to enrich the teaching armamentarium in medical education and to further enhance interest and knowledge in thoracic diseases among medical students.

Indexed as

blended learningmedical educationonline learningradiology educationthoracic imaging

Identifiers

PMID38076269
PMCPMC10701891
OpenAlexW4388942290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.