Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37278777›Full record

ReviewThe western journal of emergency medicine2023

Feedback in Medical Education: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.

Sreeja Natesan, Jaime Jordan, Alexander Sheng, Guy Carmelli, Brian Barbas, Andrew King, Kataryza Gore, Molly Estes, Michael Gottlieb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sreeja NatesanDuke University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jaime JordanDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Alexander ShengBoston Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Guy CarmelliUniversity of Massachusetts, Department of Emergency Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Brian BarbasLoyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
Andrew KingThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Kataryza GoreRush University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Molly EstesLoma Linda University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda, California.
Michael GottliebRush University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within medical education, feedback is an invaluable tool to facilitate learning and growth throughout a physician's training and beyond. Despite the importance of feedback, variations in practice indicate the need for evidence-based guidelines to inform best practices. Additionally, time constraints, variable acuity, and workflow in the emergency department (ED) pose unique challenges to providing effective feedback. This paper outlines expert guidelines for feedback in the ED setting from members of the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine Best Practices Subcommittee, based on the best evidence available through a critical review of the literature. We provide guidance on the use of feedback in medical education, with a focus on instructor strategies for giving feedback and learner strategies for receiving feedback, and we offer suggestions for fostering a culture of feedback.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalEmergency MedicineInternship and ResidencyPhysician ExecutivesFeedbackHumans

Identifiers

PMID37278777
PMCPMC10284500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.