ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2023
Nondestructive monitoring of annealing and chemical-mechanical planarization behavior using ellipsometry and deep learning.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Void-free Cu/dielectric hybrid bonding at low-temperature enabled by ultrathin metal passivation engineering for 3D-IC applications.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Long-term high-temperature aging mechanism of copper-metallized through-glass vias: a combined nanoindentation test and hybrid Potts-phase field simulation study.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- A contamination-free and low-leakage-current Cu-TSV technology enabled by engineered double-sided processing.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled multipurpose smart detection in active-matrix electrowetting-on-dielectric digital microfluidics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Generic characterization method for nano-gratings using deep-neural-network-assisted ellipsometry.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Cu-filling process in through-silicon via (TSV-Cu) is a key technology for chip stacking and three-dimensional vertical packaging. During this process, defects resulting from chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) and annealing severely affect the reliability of the chips. Traditional methods of defect characterization are destructive and cumbersome. In this study, a new defect inspection method was developed using Mueller matrix spectroscopic ellipsometry. TSV-Cu with a 3-μm-diameter and 8-μm-deep Cu filling showed three typical types of characteristics: overdishing (defect-OD), protrusion (defect-P), and defect-free. The process dimension for each defect was 13 nm. First, the three typical defects caused by CMP and annealing were investigated. With single-channel deep learning and a Mueller matrix element (MME), the TSV-Cu defect types could be distinguished with an accuracy rate of 99.94%. Next, seven effective MMEs were used as independent channels in the artificial neural network to quantify the height variation in the Cu filling in the z-direction. The accuracy rate was 98.92% after training, and the recognition accuracy reached 1 nm. The proposed approach rapidly and nondestructively evaluates the annealing bonding performance of CMP processes, which can improve the reliability of high-density integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.