Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077687›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Optimization of cacao beans fermentation by native species and electromagnetic fields.

Tania María Guzmán-Armenteros, Luis Alejandro Ramos-Guerrero, Luis Santiago Guerra, Stefan Weckx, Jenny Ruales

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tania María Guzmán-ArmenterosDepartamento de Ciencia de Alimentos y Biotecnología (DECAB), Escuela Politécnica Nacional (EPN), Quito, Ecuador.
Luis Alejandro Ramos-GuerreroCentro de Investigación de Alimentos, CIAL, Universidad UTE, EC170527 Quito, Ecuador.
Luis Santiago GuerraDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidad Central del Ecuador (UCE), Capus El Dorador, Quito, Ecuador.
Stefan WeckxResearch Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Faculty of Sciences and Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Jenny RualesDepartamento de Ciencia de Alimentos y Biotecnología (DECAB), Escuela Politécnica Nacional (EPN), Quito, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acid and bitter notes of the cocoa clone Cacao Castro Naranjal 51 (CCN 51) negatively affect the final quality of the chocolate. Thence, the fermentative process of cocoa beans using native species and electromagnetic fields (EMF) was carried out to evaluate the effect on the yield and quality of CCN 51 cocoa beans. The variables magnetic field density (D), exposure time (T), and inoculum concentration (IC) were optimized through response surface methodology to obtain two statistically validated second-order models, explaining 88.39% and 92.51% of the variability in the yield and quality of the beans, respectively. In the coordinate: 5 mT(D), 22.5 min (T), and 1.6% (CI), yield and bean quality improved to 110% and 120% above the control (without magnetic field). The metagenomic analysis showed that the changes in the microbial communities favored the aroma profile at low and intermediate field densities (5-42 mT) with high yields and floral, fruity, and nutty notes. Conversely, field densities (80 mT) were evaluated with low yields and undesirable notes of acidity and bitterness. The findings revealed that EMF effectively improves the yield and quality of CCN 51 cocoa beans with future applications in the development and quality of chocolate products.

Indexed as

ANOVACCN51Cocoa fermentationElectromagnetic fieldResponse surface

Identifiers

PMID37077687
PMCPMC10106516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.