Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988214›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2023

Effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid on working memory and attention: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

Ahmet Al Tınok, Aytaç Karabay, Joost de Jong, Gülşen Balta, Elkan G Akyürek

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effect of attention shifting on Chinese children's word reading in primary school.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmet Al TınokDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8168-2792
Aytaç KarabayDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-1531
Joost de JongDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gülşen BaltaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Elkan G AkyürekDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLNew York University Abu Dhabi · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundγ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a primary inhibitory neurotransmitter that plays a significant role in the central nervous system. Studies on both animals and humans show that GABA has the pharmacological potential for reducing the impact of cognitive disorders, as well as enhancing cognitive functions and mood. However, its specific effects on human attention and working memory have not yet been extensively studied.

aimsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and crossover trial, we aimed to test whether the administration of 800 mg GABA, dissolved in a drink, acutely affected visual working memory (VWM) maintenance, as well as temporal and spatial attention in healthy adults.

methodsThe participants were 32 young adults (16 females and 16 males). Working memory recall precision, spatial attention and temporal attention were measured by a delayed match-to-sample task, a visual search (VS) task and a speeded rapid serial visual presentation task, respectively. Participants completed two experimental sessions (GABA and Placebo) in randomized and counterbalanced order. In each session, 45 min after administration of the drink, they completed all three aforementioned cognitive tasks.

resultsLinear mixed model analysis results showed that GABA increased VS time, compared to the placebo, but did not affect VS accuracy, temporal attention, nor VWM precision.

conclusionsThe results suggest that GABA increases VS time but does not affect temporal attention and memory, and that previously reported effects on cognition might rely on other functions.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMemory, Short-TermCognitionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemalegamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMaleYoung Adultgamma-Aminobutyric Acidcrossover trialGamma-aminobutyric acidspatial attentiontemporal attentionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36988214
PMCPMC10291391
OpenAlexW4361288697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.