Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36970548›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2023

Study design challenges and strategies in clinical trials for rare diseases: Lessons learned from pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.

Aleksandar Videnovic, Helle C V Pfeiffer, Anna Tylki-Szymańska, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, Fatih Ezgü, Jitendra Ganju, Agnieszka Jurecka, Anthony E Lang

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Novel advanced patient-derivedFrontiers in neurology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Aleksandar VidenovicDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Helle C V PfeifferDepartment of Child Neurology, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Anna Tylki-SzymańskaDepartment of Pediatrics, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Children's Memorial Health Institute IPCZD, Warsaw, Poland.
Elizabeth Berry-KravisDepartment of Pediatrics, Neurological Sciences, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Fatih EzgüDepartment of Pediatrics, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Jitendra GanjuConsultant to BridgeBio, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Agnieszka JureckaCoA Therapeutics, Inc., A BridgeBio Company, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Anthony E LangDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, and the Rossy Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
BridgeBio (United States) · USChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLGazi University · TRIo Therapeutics (United States) · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USOslo University Hospital · NORush University Medical Center · USToronto Western Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial challenges in study design and methodology exist during clinical trial development to examine treatment response in patients with a rare disease, especially those with predominant central nervous system involvement and heterogeneity in clinical manifestations and natural history. Here we discuss crucial decisions which may significantly impact success of the study, including patient selection and recruitment, identification and selection of endpoints, determination of the study duration, consideration of control groups including natural history controls, and selection of appropriate statistical analyses. We review strategies for the successful development of a clinical trial to evaluate treatment of a rare disease with a focus on inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) that present with movement disorders. The strategies presented using pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) as the rare disease example can be applied to other rare diseases, particularly IEMs with movement disorders (e.g., other neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation disorders, lysosomal storage disorders). The significant challenges associated with designing a clinical trial in rare disease can sometimes be successfully met through strategic engagement with experts in the rare disease, seeking regulatory and biostatistical guidance, and early involvement of patients and families. In addition to these strategies, we discuss the urgent need for a paradigm shift within the regulatory processes to help accelerate medical product development and bring new innovations and advances to patients with rare neurodegenerative diseases who need them earlier in disease progression and prior to clinical manifestations.

Indexed as

clinical trial designinborn errors of metabolismmovement disordersorphan diseaseultra-rare disease

Identifiers

PMID36970548
PMCPMC10032345
OpenAlexW4323543410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
identifiers read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.