Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540562›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2022

Implementation and evaluation of a Tele-OSCE in oral and maxillofacial surgery - a pilot report.

Lukas Benedikt Seifert, Alawia Coppola, Julian Wilhelm Amadeus Diers, Christoph Kohl, Vanessa Britz, Jasmina Sterz, Miriam Rüsseler, Robert Sader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lukas Benedikt SeifertUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany.
Alawia CoppolaUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany.
Julian Wilhelm Amadeus DiersUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christoph KohlUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany.
Vanessa BritzGoethe University, Medical Faculty, Frankfurt Interdisciplinary Simulation Center (FIneST), Frankfurt, Germany.
Jasmina SterzGoethe University, Medical Faculty, Frankfurt Interdisciplinary Simulation Center (FIneST), Frankfurt, Germany.
Miriam RüsselerUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Department for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany.
Robert SaderUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Department for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ongoing changes in learning and education towards digitalisation have been rapidly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Especially in dental education where contact to the oral cavity is an integral part of training the chosen digital examination methods and training formats must undergo high requirements to full fill the goal of a real alternative to face-to-face exams. Therefore, this study compared student performance in a newly developed Tele-OSCE with a prior OSCE examinations in presence within an oral- and maxillofacial surgery curriculum. Methods: Study participants were fourth-year (in a five year curriculum) dental students and board certified maxillofacial surgeons (examiners) that took part in a newly developed Tele-OSCE that comprised three five-minute stations (structured facial examination, management mandibular fracture and squamous cell carcinoma) using the zoom® software. Student performance was measured using validated OSCE-Checklists and compared to a previous OSCE examination from the winter term 2019 with the same OSCE stations that was conducted in presence. Significant differences were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. Furthermore, the new Tele-OSCE was evaluated by students and examiners using previously developed questionnaires. Results: Sixty-six dental students (study group: n=34, summer term 2021, control group: n=32 winter term 2019) and nine examiners participated in the study. Compared to previous non-pandemic OSCEs, there were no significant (p=0.53) differences in overall student performance. Evaluation of the Tele-OSCE showed that the demonstration and rating of practical skills was limited due to missing standard patients or phantoms, however, students did not fear to be misjudged. The demonstration and rating of anamnestic and consultation competencies was seen as unproblematic by students and examiners. Discussion: This pilot-study showed the feasibility of a Tele-OSCE as a formative examination in dental education. However, both students and examiners felt that the demonstration and assessment of practical skills was limited due the new examination format. Nevertheless, Tele-OSCEs might offer an alternative to enable students to complete their dental training.

Indexed as

COVID-19Surgery, OralClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementHumansPandemicsPilot Projectsdentoalveolar surgeryoral and maxillofacial SurgeryOSCEtelemedicine, teledentistry

Identifiers

PMID36540562
PMCPMC9733482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.