Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540555›Full record

SynthesisGMS journal for medical education2022

Publication activities relating to digital teaching and learning in the GMS Journal for Medical Education - a descriptive analysis (1984-2020).

Christin Kleinsorgen, Andrea Baumann, Barbara Braun, Jan Griewatz, Johannes Lang, Holger Lenz, Johanna Mink, Tobias Raupach, Bernd Romeike, Thomas Christian Sauter and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in GMS journal for medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christin KleinsorgenUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Centre for E-Learning, Didactics and Educational Research (ZELDA), Hannover, Germany.
Andrea BaumannUniversity of Tübingen, Faculty of Medicine, The Competence Center for University Teaching in Medicine Baden-Württemberg, Faculty, Tübingen, Germany.
Barbara BraunMedical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Studies and teaching development, digital teaching, Mannheim, Germany.
Jan GriewatzUniversity of Tübingen, Faculty of Medicine, The Competence Center for University Teaching in Medicine Baden-Württemberg, Faculty, Tübingen, Germany.
Johannes LangJustus-Liebig University Gießen, Faculty of Medicine, Division for Study and Teaching, Gießen, Germany.
Holger LenzLMU Munich, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Education, Munich, Germany.
Johanna MinkUniversity Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Medicine and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias RaupachUniversity Hospital Bonn, Institute for Medical Education, Bonn, Germany.
Bernd RomeikeUniversity Medical Center, Academic Dean's Office, Division of Medical Education, Rostock, Germany.
Thomas Christian SauterUniversity Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
Achim SchneiderUlm University, Medical Faculty, Office of the Dean of Studies, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel TolksLeuphana University Lüneburg, Centre for Applied Health Promotion, Lüneburg, Germany.
Inga HegeLMU Munich, University Hospital, Institute for Medical Education, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and objectives: Digital teaching, learning and assessment have been part of medical education and continuing education for decades. The objective of this review paper is to highlight developments and perspectives in these areas in the GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS JME). Methodology: In the spring of 2020, we conducted a systematic literature search of the Journal for Medical Education (JME) and analysed the articles with regard to different categories such as article type, digital tools used or mode of data collection. Results: Of the 132 articles analysed, 78 were digital interventions (53 of which were exploratory-descriptive), 28 were project descriptions, 16 were surveys of needs or equipment and 10 were concept papers. About one-third of the studies and project reports each dealt with virtual patients or case-based learning, whereas no articles were published on trends such as serious games or virtual reality. Overall, our analysis shows that in many respects, the studies on digital teaching were more broadly based, especially between 2006 and 2010, after which this trend tended to decline again. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that publications in the JME consider some key aspects of digital teaching in medical education and continuing education, such as educational videos or virtual patients. The variability of information and methods of presentation advocate the use of guidelines to optimise the quality of scientific papers. Furthermore, clues for future research topics and experimental study designs are identified.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalLearningHumansdigital assessmentdigital learningdigital teachinge-learningGMS Journal for Medical Educationliterature review

Identifiers

PMID36540555
PMCPMC9733476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.