Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36532544›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Microbial diversity of meat products under spoilage and its controlling approaches.

Yanli Zhu, Wei Wang, Ming Li, Jiamin Zhang, Lili Ji, Zhiping Zhao, Rui Zhang, Demin Cai, Lin Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanli ZhuKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Wei WangKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Ming LiKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Jiamin ZhangKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Lili JiKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Zhiping ZhaoKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Rui ZhangKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Demin CaiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Lin ChenKey Lab of Meat Processing of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meat spoilage (MS) is a complex microbial ecological process involving multiple specific microbial interactions. MS is detrimental to people's health and leads to the waste of meat products which caused huge losses during production, storage, transportation, and marketing. A thorough understanding of microorganisms related to MS and their controlling approaches is a necessary prerequisite for delaying the occurrence of MS and developing new methods and strategies for meat product preservation. This mini-review summarizes the diversity of spoilage microorganisms in livestock, poultry, and fish meat, and the approaches to inhibit MS. This would facilitate the targeted development of technologies against MS, to extend meat's shelf life, and effectively diminish food waste and economic losses.

Indexed as

bacterial communityfish meatlivestockmicrobial spoilagepoultry

Identifiers

PMID36532544
PMCPMC9752900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.