Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506706›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of food science2022

Evaluation of Antioxidant Capacity (ABTS and CUPRAC) and Total Phenolic Content (Folin-Ciocalteu) Assays of Selected Fruit, Vegetables, and Spices.

Jenson George, David Edwards, Sharon Pun, David Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of food science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Discrimination of Green Coffee (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenson GeorgeDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Health and Food Sciences Precinct, Block 10, 39 Kessels Road, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6387-1319
David EdwardsDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Health and Food Sciences Precinct, Block 10, 39 Kessels Road, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-3470
Sharon PunDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Health and Food Sciences Precinct, Block 10, 39 Kessels Road, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2589-0727
David WilliamsDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Health and Food Sciences Precinct, Block 10, 39 Kessels Road, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antioxidant (AOX) capacity assays are important analytical tools, used worldwide to measure the AOX capacities of various food commodities. Although numerous protocols have been published to ascertain AOX capacities, there are increasing concerns about the reliability of many of these assays. Poor correlation of results between various assays, as well as problems with reproducibility, consistency, and accuracy, is to blame. Published AOX assays also differ markedly from each other by employing different reaction conditions, using different extracting solvents, and applying dissimilar quantification methods. In this study, AOX capacities of a range of fruit, vegetables, and spices, commonly consumed and of commercial importance in Australia and worldwide, were measured in both hydrophilic and lipophilic solvents by using two different assay systems. As the polyphenolic compounds present in any sample matrix are the main contributors to its AOX properties, the commodities were also analysed for total phenolic content (TPC), again using both solvent systems. Analysis of the results from the current study with values from the published literature exposed the challenges that make direct comparison of any quantitative results difficult. However, a strong mutual correlation of our assay results facilitated a meaningful comparison of the data within the laboratory. Concurrent use of lipophilic and hydrophilic solvents made the results more reliable and understandable. Findings from this study will aid to address the existing challenges and bring a more rational basis to the AOX capacities. This unique analytical approach also provided a platform to build an internal reference database for the commonly consumed and commercially important food commodities with the potential to broaden the scope into a database for similar food matrices.

Identifiers

PMID36506706
PMCPMC9729023
OpenAlexW4311044336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.