ArticleCurrent research in food science2022
Comparative study of factors affecting the recovery of proteins from malt rootlets using pressurized liquids and ultrasounds.
Article in Current research in food science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional and Nutritional Properties of Proteins From Barley Malting By-Products.Journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malt rootlets (MR) are a waste from brewing with high protein content. This work proposes to study the impact of extracting parameters on the recovery of proteins and the characteristics of extracts from MR using ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE). A Box-Behnken experimental design was employed to study the effect of extracting parameters on the protein yield, while characterization comprised the study of antioxidant properties, the identification of extracted proteins using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry, and the evaluation of the co-extraction of phenolic compounds. Protein extraction was promoted at an ultrasounds amplitude of 68%, for 20 min at 52 °C in UAE, while adding 33% ethanol resulted in the highest yield in PLE. While UAE extracted 53 ± 5% of MR proteins, PLE reached a 73 ± 7%, using more sustainable conditions. Significant antioxidant activities were observed in the PLE extract, although undermined by gastrointestinal digestion. Proteomic analysis detected 68 proteins from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.