Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140920›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB): Autochthonous and Probiotic Microbes for Meat Preservation and Fortification.

Dibyajit Lahiri, Moupriya Nag, Tanmay Sarkar, Rina Rani Ray, Mohammad Ali Shariati, Maksim Rebezov, Sneh Punia Bangar, José M Lorenzo, Rubén Domínguez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Dibyajit LahiriDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata 700160, India.
Moupriya NagDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata 700160, India.
Tanmay SarkarDepartment of Food Processing Technology, Malda Polytechnic, West Bengal State Council of Technical Education, Government of West Bengal, Malda 732102, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-1604
Rina Rani RayDepartment of Biotechnology, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Haringhata 741249, India.
Mohammad Ali ShariatiSemey Branch of the Institute, Kazakh Research Institute of Processing and Food Industry, 238«G» Gagarin Ave., Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9376-5771
Maksim RebezovDepartment of Scientific Research, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 127550 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0857-5143
Sneh Punia BangarDepartment of Food, Nutrition and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8675-6399
José M LorenzoCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Avd. Galicia Nº4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7725-9294
Rubén DomínguezCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Avd. Galicia Nº4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2764-504X
Moscow State Agroengineering University named after V.P. Goryachkin · RUUniversity of Engineering & Management · INClemson University · USGovernment of West Bengal · INMaulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies · INUniversidade de Vigo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enhanced concern of the consumers regarding the safety, quality of the food products, and avoidance of the use of chemical food preservatives has resulted in a breakthrough in biopreservation. This has resulted in the use of beneficial microbial species, including bacteria and their secondary metabolites, to enhance the shelf-life and quality of the food products. Meat preservation and fortification are among the biggest concerns, as they are relevant to the majority of food products. The chemical preservatives conventionally used in preserving meat and meat products possess several detrimental effects on the consumers. Thus, alternative strategies are needed to combat strategically in facilitating the shelf-life and quality. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are considered the safest organism and have a profound role in food and food-processing industries. The biofilm developed by the bacteria prevents the growth of various undesirable microorganisms on meat and meat products. Various studies depicted that LAB produces various antimicrobial metabolites that can act effectively on the food-degrading pathogens, rendering it safe and enhancing shelf-life. This review, thus, deals with the use of LAB as biopreservatives for enhancing the shelf-life of meat and meat products and helping its fortification.

Indexed as

antimicrobial metabolitesfood fortificationfood microbiologyfood safetyshelf-life

Identifiers

PMID36140920
PMCPMC9498044
OpenAlexW4295886822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.