Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120824›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science2022

Multitarget preservation technologies for chemical-free sustainable meat processing.

Ramandeep Kaur, Lovedeep Kaur, Tanushree B Gupta, Jaspreet Singh, John Bronlund

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ramandeep KaurSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Lovedeep KaurSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-0416
Tanushree B GuptaAgResearch Ltd, Hopkirk Research Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Jaspreet SinghSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5301-0953
John BronlundSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Funding

Massey University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the growing consumer demand for safe and naturally processed meats, the meat industry is seeking novel methods to produce safe-to-consume meat products without affecting their sensory appeal. The green technologies can maintain the sensory and nutritive characteristics and ensure the microbial safety of processed meats and, therefore, can help to reduce the use of chemical preservatives in meat products. The use of chemical additives, especially nitrites in processed meat products, has become controversial because they may form carcinogenic N-nitrosamines, a few of which are suspected as cancer precursors. Thus, the objective of reducing or eliminating nitrite is of great interest to meat researchers and industries. This review, for the first time, discusses the influence of processing technologies such as microwave, irradiation, high-pressure thermal processing (HPTP) and multitarget preservation technology on the quality characteristics of processed meats, with a focus on their sensory quality. These emerging technologies can help in the alleviation of ingoing nitrite or formed nitrosamine contents in meat products. The multitarget preservation technology is an innovative way to enhance the shelf life of meat products through the combined use of different technologies/natural additives. The challenges and opportunities associated with the use of these technologies for processing meat are also reviewed.

Indexed as

Meat ProductsNitrosaminesMeatNitritesTechnologyNitritesNitrosamineshigh-pressure thermal treatmentinnovative technologiesirradiationmicrowavesmultitarget preservation technology

Identifiers

PMID36120824
PMCPMC9825855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.