Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034919›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Consumer acceptance of new food trends resulting from the fourth industrial revolution technologies: A narrative review of literature and future perspectives.

Abdo Hassoun, Janna Cropotova, Monica Trif, Alexandru Vasile Rusu, Otilia Bobiş, Gulzar Ahmad Nayik, Yash D Jagdale, Farhan Saeed, Muhammad Afzaal, Parisa Mostashari and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Synthetic Biology Approaches to Enzymology in Food and Agriculture Systems.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of the trade-off between variety, processing, and low-GI claim in ready-to-eat rice.Food science and technology international = Ciencia y tecnologia de los alimentos internacional · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Effect ofNutrients · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abdo HassounSustainable AgriFoodtech Innovation and Research (SAFIR), Arras, France.
Janna CropotovaDepartment of Biological Sciences Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway.
Monica TrifDepartment of Food Research, Centre for Innovative Process Engineering (CENTIV) GmbH, Syke, Germany.
Alexandru Vasile RusuLife Science Institute, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Otilia BobişAnimal Science and Biotechnology Faculty, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Gulzar Ahmad NayikDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Government Degree College, Shopian, India.
Yash D JagdaleMIT School of Food Technology, MIT ADT University, Pune, India.
Farhan SaeedDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad AfzaalDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Parisa MostashariDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amin Mousavi KhaneghahDepartment of Fruit and Vegetable Product Technology, Prof. Wacław Dabrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology - State Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Joe M RegensteinDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing consumer awareness of climate change and the resulting food sustainability issues have led to an increasing adoption of several emerging food trends. Some of these trends have been strengthened by the emergence of the fourth industrial revolution (or Industry 4.0), and its innovations and technologies that have fundamentally reshaped and transformed current strategies and prospects for food production and consumption patterns. In this review a general overview of the industrial revolutions through a food perspective will be provided. Then, the current knowledge base regarding consumer acceptance of eight traditional animal-proteins alternatives (e.g., plant-based foods and insects) and more recent trends (e.g., cell-cultured meat and 3D-printed foods) will be updated. A special focus will be given to the impact of digital technologies and other food Industry 4.0 innovations on the shift toward greener, healthier, and more sustainable diets. Emerging food trends have promising potential to promote nutritious and sustainable alternatives to animal-based products. This literature narrative review showed that plant-based foods are the largest portion of alternative proteins but intensive research is being done with other sources (notably the insects and cell-cultured animal products). Recent technological advances are likely to have significant roles in enhancing sensory and nutritional properties, improving consumer perception of these emerging foods. Thus, consumer acceptance and consumption of new foods are predicted to continue growing, although more effort should be made to make these food products more convenient, nutritious, and affordable, and to market them to consumers positively emphasizing their safety and benefits.

Indexed as

3D food printingalternative proteinsconsumer perceptioncultured meatedible insectsindustry 4.0personalized nutritionplant-based food

Identifiers

PMID36034919
PMCPMC9399420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.