Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956258›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

Legumes-A Comprehensive Exploration of Global Food-Based Dietary Guidelines and Consumption.

Jaimee Hughes, Emma Pearson, Sara Grafenauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Legume Consumption in Relation to Ulcerative Colitis: A Case-Control Study.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2026
    Article
  9. Perceptions, Knowledge and Culinary Use of Legumes in Australia: A Convenience Sample Analysis.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Floristic inventory of the main markets of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaimee HughesGrains & Legumes Nutrition Council, 1 Rivett Rd., North Ryde 2113, Australia.
Emma PearsonSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong 2522, Australia.
Sara GrafenauerSchool of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick 2052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-known human and planetary health benefits of legumes, consumption is often low. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the inclusion of legumes in global food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG), and to review consumption data against global food group classifications for legumes. The review of FBDG from 94 countries identified legume-based key messaging, the key terms used to define legumes, recommended serving size and frequency of consumption and the classification of legumes into food groups as depicted by food guides. The 2018 Global Dietary Database isolated consumption data of legumes and beans using individual-level, nationally representative dietary survey data for matched countries. Food-based dietary guidelines from 40/94 countries most often identified legumes utilising the term legumes, followed by beans (

Indexed as

FabaceaeDietHumansNutrition PolicyServing SizeVegetableschronic diseaseconsumptiondietary guidelineslegumessustainability

Identifiers

PMID35956258
PMCPMC9370574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.