Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Verification of autoclaving-cooling treatment to increase the resistant starch contents in food starches based on meta-analysis result.

Didah Nur Faridah, Rhoito Frista Silitonga, Dias Indrasti, Frendy Ahmad Afandi, Anuraga Jayanegara, Maria Putri Anugerah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Didah Nur FaridahDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering Technology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Rhoito Frista SilitongaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering Technology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Dias IndrastiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering Technology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Frendy Ahmad AfandiDeputy Ministry for Food and Agribusiness, Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Anuraga JayanegaraDepartment of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, Institut Pertanian Bogor University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Maria Putri AnugerahDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering Technology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
IPB University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoclaving-cooling is a common starch modification method to increase the resistant starch (RS) content. The effect of this method varies depending on the type of crop and treatment condition used. The objectives of this study were to verify the autoclaving-cooling treatment based on a meta-analysis result and to evaluate the physicochemical properties of modified starches. The meta-analysis study used 10 articles from a total of 1,293 that were retrieved using the PRISMA approach. Meta-analysis showed that the optimal treatments of autoclaving-cooling process that increase the RS content significantly, was in starch samples from the cereal group (corn, oats, rice) (SMD: 19.60; 95% CI: 9.56-29.64;

Indexed as

autoclaving-coolingcerealmeta-analysisresistant starchstarch modification

Identifiers

PMID35928838
PMCPMC9343710
OpenAlexW4285794281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.