Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676696›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Professional identity formation of medical students: A mixed-methods study in a hierarchical and collectivist culture.

Ardi Findyartini, Nadia Greviana, Estivana Felaza, Muhammad Faruqi, Taris Zahratul Afifah, Mutiara Auliya Firdausy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ardi FindyartiniMedical Education Center, Faculty of Medicine, Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. ardi.findyartini@ui.ac.id.
Nadia GrevianaMedical Education Center, Faculty of Medicine, Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Estivana FelazaMedical Education Center, Faculty of Medicine, Indonesia Medical Education and Research Institute, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Muhammad FaruqiDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Taris Zahratul AfifahDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Mutiara Auliya FirdausyDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
University of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional identity formation (PIF) has been recognized as an integral part of professional development in medical education. PIF is dynamic: it occurs longitudinally and requires immersion in the socialization process. Consequently, in the medical education context, it is vital to foster a nurturing learning environment that facilitates PIF.

aimThis study assesses PIF among medical students in various stages of study and explores their perceptions of PIF, with its contributing and inhibiting factors.

methodThis mixed-methods study uses a sequential explanatory approach with undergraduate (years 2, 4, and 6) and postgraduate medical students in Indonesia. We examine the subjects by administering an adapted questionnaire on PIF. We completed a series of FGDs following questionnaire administration. Quantitative and thematic analyses were conducted sequentially. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: A total of 433 respondents completed the questionnaire. There were statistically significant differences among subjects on the subscales "Recognition and internalization of professional roles" and "Self-control in professional behavior"; the more senior students had higher scores. We conducted 6 FGDs in total. The results characterize PIF as a complex, dynamic, and longitudinal journey to becoming a medical doctor that is closely related to a student's motivation. The FGDs also highlight the importance of both internal factors (students' values, attributes, and personal circumstances) and external factors (curriculum, the learning environment, workplace-based learning, and external expectations) for PIF in medical education.

conclusionHigher-level students show higher scores in some aspects of PIF, which further validates the potential use of the questionnaire to monitor PIF, a dynamic process influenced by internal and external factors. Generating awareness among medical students and encouraging reflection on their PIF stage may be crucial for PIF processes.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduatePhysiciansStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansSocial IdentificationMedical studentsMixed-methods studyProfessional identity formation

Identifiers

PMID35676696
PMCPMC9175156
OpenAlexW4282919373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.