Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35526065›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2022

The Salzburg 10/7 HIIT shock cycle study: the effects of a 7-day high-intensity interval training shock microcycle with or without additional low-intensity training on endurance performance, well-being, stress and recovery in endurance trained athletes-study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Thomas Leonhard Stöggl, Julia C Blumkaitis, Tilmann Strepp, Mahdi Sareban, Perikles Simon, Elmo W I Neuberger, Thomas Finkenzeller, Natalia Nunes, Lorenz Aglas, Nils Haller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05067426 (The 10/7 HIIT Shock Cycle Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05067426 nacompletednot on this map

The 10/7 HIIT Shock Cycle Study: The Effects of a 7-Day High-Intensity-Interval Training Shock Microcycle on Endurance Performance, Well-Being, Stress and Recovery in Endurance Trained Athletes - Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SalzburgRan2021 to 2022Enrolled33ConditionsHealthy, Athlete, PerformanceArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas Leonhard Stöggl *Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Julia C Blumkaitis *Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Tilmann StreppDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Mahdi SarebanUniversity Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation and Research Institute of Molecular Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Perikles SimonDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Elmo W I NeubergerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas FinkenzellerDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Natalia NunesDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Lorenz AglasDepartment of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Nils HallerDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. nils.haller@plus.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-7615
University of Salzburg · ATJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforming multiple high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions in a compressed period of time (approximately 7-14 days) is called a HIIT shock microcycle (SM) and promises a rapid increase in endurance performance. However, the efficacy of HIIT-SM, as well as knowledge about optimal training volumes during a SM in the endurance-trained population have not been adequately investigated. This study aims to examine the effects of two different types of HIIT-SM (with or without additional low-intensity training (LIT)) compared to a control group (CG) on key endurance performance variables. Moreover, participants are closely monitored for stress, fatigue, recovery, and sleep before, during and after the intervention using innovative biomarkers, questionnaires, and wearable devices.

methodsThis is a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial that includes the results of a pilot participant. Thirty-six endurance trained athletes will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a HIIT-SM (HSM) group, HIIT-SM with additional LIT (HSM + LIT) group or a CG. All participants will be monitored before (9 days), during (7 days), and after (14 days) a 7-day intervention, for a total of 30 days. Participants in both intervention groups will complete 10 HIIT sessions over 7 consecutive days, with an additional 30 min of LIT in the HSM + LIT group. HIIT sessions consist of aerobic HIIT, i.e., 5 × 4 min at 90-95% of maximal heart rate interspersed by recovery periods of 2.5 min. To determine the effects of the intervention, physiological exercise testing, and a 5 km time trial will be conducted before and after the intervention.

resultsThe feasibility study indicates good adherence and performance improvement of the pilot participant. Load monitoring tools, i.e., biomarkers and questionnaires showed increased values during the intervention period, indicating sensitive variables.

conclusionThis study will be the first to examine the effects of different total training volumes of HIIT-SM, especially the combination of LIT and HIIT in the HSM + LIT group. In addition, different assessments to monitor the athletes' load during such an exhaustive training period will allow the identification of load monitoring tools such as innovative biomarkers, questionnaires, and wearable technology.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT05067426. Registered 05 October 2021-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05067426 . Protocol Version Issue date: 1 Dec 2021. Original protocol. Authors: TLS, NH.

Indexed as

Block trainingHIITHITInterval exerciseLITLoad monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35526065
PMCPMC9077880
OpenAlexW4229024374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.