Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35525940›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2022

Team-based learning versus interactive lecture in achieving learning outcomes and improving clinical reasoning skills: a randomized crossover study.

Muhammad Imran, Taher Fawzy Halawa, Mukhtiar Baig, Ahmed Mohammed Almanjoumi, Mohammed Mustafa Badri, Waleed Ahmed Alghamdi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad ImranDepartment of Surgery, Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Building 13, PO Box No. 80200, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia. minmuhammad@kau.edu.sa.
Taher Fawzy HalawaDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mukhtiar BaigDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Assessment Unit, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Mohammed AlmanjoumiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Mustafa BadriDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Waleed Ahmed AlghamdiDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Western Region, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Abdulaziz University D1440-138-140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the impact of interactive lecture (IL) and team-based learning (TBL) on improving clinical reasoning skills (CRSs) and achieving learning outcomes (LO). Students' feedback was obtained about the strategies.

methodsThis study was carried out at the Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Two modules, endocrinology, and emergency were selected. Students of each batch in both modules were divided into two arms. With a randomized crossover design, IL & TBL were used for two separate topics in each module. After each topic, a quiz in the form of well-structured MCQs was taken. A questionnaire was designed to obtain students' feedback. SPSS version 23 was used to analyse results. The difference between the mean values was calculated by Student's t-test. Feedback data is presented as frequency. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsLearning outcomes were achieved by all groups in two modules, with both instructional strategies, IL and TBL. Students attempted >70% correct answers. However, in the emergency module, the groups with TBL as the instructional strategy performed better in quiz1 and quiz 2 (p = 0.026 and p = 0.016, respectively). Similarly, in the endocrinology module (3

conclusionsStudents achieved LOs and CRS better with TBL as an instructional strategy. They preferred TBL over IL. It is suggested to include TBL, or increase its percentage, in the curriculum.

Indexed as

Clinical ReasoningProblem-Based LearningCross-Over StudiesEducational MeasurementGroup ProcessesHumansClinical reasoning skillsInteractive lectureLearning outcomesTeam-based learning

Identifiers

PMID35525940
PMCPMC9080179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.