Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366218›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Preparing Future Medicine Physicians to Care for Cancer Survivors: Project ECHO® in a Novel Internal Medicine and Family Medicine Residency Curriculum.

Youngjee Choi, Alaina C Chodoff, Krysta Brown, Luis A Murillo, Jonathan Nesfeder, Marielle T Bugayong, Kimberly S Peairs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The implementation of a novel adult cancer survivorship curriculum in a family medicine residency program: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Family Physician Training Needs to Improve Cancer Patient Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The House Cup: Using Longitudinal Gamification to Improve Didactic Attendance.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Youngjee ChoiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. ychoi47@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8104-1960
Alaina C ChodoffGreater Baltimore Medical Center Department of Medicine, Towson, MD, USA.
Krysta BrownDepartment of Medicine, TowerHealth/Reading Hospital, West Reading, PA, USA.
Luis A MurilloDepartment of Family Medicine, TowerHealth/Reading Hospital, West Reading, PA, USA.
Jonathan NesfederDepartment of Medicine, TowerHealth/Reading Hospital, West Reading, PA, USA.
Marielle T BugayongDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kimberly S PeairsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer survivorship education is limited in residency training. The goal of this pilot curriculum was to teach medicine residents a structured approach to cancer survivorship care. During the 2020-2021 academic year, we held eight 45-min sessions in an ambulatory noon conference series for a community family medicine (FM) and internal medicine (IM) residency program. The curriculum used Project ECHO®, an interactive model of tele-education through Zoom video conferencing, to connect trainees with specialists. Each session had a cancer-specific focus (e.g., breast cancer survivorship) and incorporated a range of core survivorship topics (e.g., surveillance, treatment effects). The session format included a resident case presentation and didactic lecture by an expert discussant. Residents completed pre- and post-curricular surveys to assess for changes in attitude, confidence, practice patterns, and/or knowledge in cancer survivorship care. Of 67 residents, 23/24 FM and 41/43 IM residents participated in the curriculum. Residents attended a mean of 3 sessions. By the end of the curriculum, resident confidence in survivorship topics (surveillance, treatment effects, genetic risk assessment) increased for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers (p < 0.05), and there was a trend toward residents stating they ask patients more often about cancer treatment effects (p = 0.07). Over 90% of residents found various curricular components useful, and over 80% reported that the curriculum would improve their practice of cancer-related testing and treatment-related monitoring. On a 15-question post-curricular knowledge check, the mean correct score was 9.4 (63%). An eight-session curriculum improved resident confidence and perceived ability to provide cancer survivorship care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsInternship and ResidencyPhysiciansCurriculumFamily PracticeHumansMaleCancer survivorshipMedical educationPrimary careProject ECHO®Tele-education

Identifiers

PMID35366218
PMCPMC8976217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.