Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35257004›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Exploring biotechnological and functional characteristics of probiotic yeasts: A review.

B Shruthi, N Deepa, Rakesh Somashekaraiah, G Adithi, S Divyashree, M Y Sreenivasa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Potent Probiotic YeastACS omega · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biotherapeutic Potential of Probiotic YeastIndian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B ShruthiApplied Mycology laboratory, Department of Studies in Microbiology, Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Mysuru 570006, India.
N DeepaApplied Mycology laboratory, Department of Studies in Microbiology, Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Mysuru 570006, India.
Rakesh SomashekaraiahApplied Mycology laboratory, Department of Studies in Microbiology, Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Mysuru 570006, India.
G AdithiApplied Mycology laboratory, Department of Studies in Microbiology, Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Mysuru 570006, India.
S DivyashreeApplied Mycology laboratory, Department of Studies in Microbiology, Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Mysuru 570006, India.
M Y SreenivasaApplied Mycology laboratory, Department of Studies in Microbiology, Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Mysuru 570006, India.
University of Mysore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are vital and beneficial organisms which offers the health benefits to the host organisms. The fungal probiotic field is one of the developing fields nowadays. Yeast has an enormous and diverse group of microorganisms that is attracting and expanding the attention from researchers and industries.

Indexed as

Antifungal activityBiotherapeuticsFungal probioticsSaccharomycesVolatile organic compoundsYeast probiotics

Identifiers

PMID35257004
PMCPMC8897636
OpenAlexW4214555794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.