Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841565›Full record

ArticleMedical education2022

Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning.

Natasja Looman, Tamara van Woezik, Dieneke van Asselt, Nynke Scherpbier-de Haan, Cornelia Fluit, Jacqueline de Graaf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Community service rehabilitation therapists' perspectives of cross-disciplinary supervision.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Learning to Prioritize Our Collaborative Opportunities: Overcoming the Bright Shiny Object Syndrome.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natasja LoomanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2104-6449
Tamara van WoezikDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dieneke van AsseltDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nynke Scherpbier-de HaanDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cornelia FluitDepartment for Research in Learning and Education, Radboudumc Health Academy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline de GraafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboudumc Health Academy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

ZonMw 80-8ZonMw 8391 3001 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring postgraduate training, considerable efforts for intraprofessional education are in place to prepare primary care residents (PC residents) and medical specialty residents (MS residents) for intraprofessional collaboration (intraPC). Power dynamics are inherently present in such hierarchical medical contexts. This affects intraPC (learning). Yet little attention has been paid to factors that impact power dynamics. This study aims to explore power dynamics and their impact on intraPC learning between PC residents and MS residents during hospital placements.

methodsThis study expands on previously published ethnographic research investigating opportunities and barriers for intraPC learning among residents in five Dutch hospitals. We analysed transcripts of observations and in-depth interviews using template analysis. A critical theory paradigm was employed. Discourse analysis additionally informed the data.

resultsWe defined five interrelated themes that describe characteristics of power dynamics in intraPC learning during hospital placements: beliefs; power distribution; interaction style; subjection; and fearless learning. Power dynamics operate both within and between the themes: power distribution between PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors seemed to be an attribution affected by underlying beliefs about professional norms or about other professions; beliefs influenced the way PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors interacted; power distribution based on inequity could lead to subjection of PC residents; power distribution based on equity could lead to fearless learning; and open interactions enabled fearless intraPC learning.

conclusionsPower dynamics have an impact on intraPC learning among residents in hospitals. Constructive power dynamics occur when power distribution is based on equity, combined with sincere open interactions, actively inviting each other into discussions and enlisting the support of MS supervisors to foster fearless learning. This can be achieved by creating awareness of implicit beliefs and making them explicit, recognising interaction that encourages intraPC learning and creating policies that support fearless intraPC learning.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyHospitalsHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID34841565
PMCPMC9300127
OpenAlexW3216089976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.