Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34789255›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2021

Development, reliability and validity of infectious disease specialist Nurse's Core competence scale.

Chao Wu, Jiaran Yan, Jing Wu, Ping Wu, Feixia Cheng, Lina Du, Yanling Du, Shang Lei, Hongjuan Lang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chao Wu *Nursing Department, Fourth Military Medical University, No.169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Jiaran Yan *Nursing Department, Fourth Military Medical University, No.169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Jing Wu *Tangdu Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Shaanxi, China.
Ping WuTongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China.
Feixia ChengNaval University of Engineering, Hubei, China.
Lina Du986th Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Shaanxi, China.
Yanling DuNursing Department, Fourth Military Medical University, No.169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Shang LeiDepartment of Health Statistics, Fourth Military Medical University, No.169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China. Shanglei@fmmu.edu.cn.
Hongjuan LangNursing Department, Fourth Military Medical University, No.169 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China. Langhj@fmmu.edu.cn.
Air Force Medical University · CNNaval University of Engineering · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aims to develop an instrument to measure infectious disease specialist nurses' core competence and examining the scale's validity and reliability.

backgroundWith the increase of infectious diseases, more and more attention has been paid to infectious disease nursing care. The core competence of the infectious disease specialist nurses is directly related to the quality of nursing work. In previous researches, infectious disease specialist nurses' core competence was measured by the tools developed for general nurses instead of specialized tools, which made it difficult to clarify the core competence of nurses in infectious diseases department.

methodsPreliminary items were developed through literature review, theoretical research, qualitative interview and Delphi method. The confirmed 47 items were applied in the two rounds of data collection. Evaluation data on 516 infectious disease specialist nurses' core competence in the first round were utilized to preliminarily evaluate and explore the scale's constrution, while evaluation data on 497 infectious disease specialist nurses' core competence in the second round were utilized to do reliability analysis and validity analysis. In this study, factor analysis, Cronbach's α, Pearson correlation coefficients were all adopted.

resultsThe final scale is composed of 34 items and 5 factors, and adopted the 5-point scoring method. The factors are Professional Development Abilities, Infection Prevention and Control Abilities, Nursing Abilities for Infectious Diseases, Professionalism and Humanistic Accomplishment, and Responsiveness to Emergency Infectious Diseases. The explanatory variance of the five factors was 75.569%. The reliability and validity of the scale is well validated. The internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.806, 0.966 and 0.831 respectively. The scale has good structural validity and content validity. The content validity was 0.869. Discrimination analysis showed that there were significant differences in the scores of core competence and its five dimensions among infectious disease specialist nurses of different ages, working years in infectious diseases, titles, educational background, marital status and wages (all P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe proposed scale takes on high reliability and validity, and is suitable for assessing the infectious disease specialist nurses' core competence. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This scale provides a reference for clinical assessment of infectious disease nursing.

Indexed as

Confirmatory factor analysisCore competenceExploratory factor analysisInfectious disease specialist nurseQuestionnaire developmentReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID34789255
PMCPMC8596351
OpenAlexW3201927523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.