Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645520›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Microbial colonization and resistome dynamics in food processing environments of a newly opened pork cutting industry during 1.5 years of activity.

José F Cobo-Díaz, Adrián Alvarez-Molina, Elena A Alexa, Calum J Walsh, Oscar Mencía-Ares, Paula Puente-Gómez, Eleni Likotrafiti, Paula Fernández-Gómez, Bernardo Prieto, Fiona Crispie and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Occurrence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolved populations ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

José F Cobo-Díaz *Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Adrián Alvarez-Molina *Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Elena A Alexa *Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Calum J WalshTeagasc Food Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Oscar Mencía-AresDepartment of Animal Health, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Paula Puente-GómezDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Eleni LikotrafitiDepartment of Food Science & Technology, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Paula Fernández-GómezDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Bernardo PrietoDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Fiona CrispieTeagasc Food Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Lorena RuizDairy Research Institute, Spanish National Research Council, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias-CSIC, Villaviciosa, Spain.
Montserrat González-RaurichDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Mercedes LópezDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Miguel PrietoDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Paul CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Avelino Alvarez-OrdóñezDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain. aalvo@unileon.es.ORCID 0000-0002-9951-4786
Universidad de León · ESTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInternational Hellenic University · GROllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe microorganisms that inhabit food processing environments (FPE) can strongly influence the associated food quality and safety. In particular, the possibility that FPE may act as a reservoir of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, and a hotspot for the transmission of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) is a concern in meat processing plants. Here, we monitor microbial succession and resistome dynamics relating to FPE through a detailed analysis of a newly opened pork cutting plant over 1.5 years of activity.

resultsWe identified a relatively restricted principal microbiota dominated by Pseudomonas during the first 2 months, while a higher taxonomic diversity, an increased representation of other taxa (e.g., Acinetobacter, Psychrobacter), and a certain degree of microbiome specialization on different surfaces was recorded later on. An increase in total abundance, alpha diversity, and β-dispersion of ARGs, which were predominantly assigned to Acinetobacter and associated with resistance to certain antimicrobials frequently used on pig farms of the region, was detected over time. Moreover, a sharp increase in the occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcaceae was observed when cutting activities started. ARGs associated with resistance to β-lactams, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, and sulphonamides frequently co-occurred, and mobile genetic elements (i.e., plasmids, integrons) and lateral gene transfer events were mainly detected at the later sampling times in drains.

conclusionsThe observations made suggest that pig carcasses were a source of resistant bacteria that then colonized FPE and that drains, together with some food-contact surfaces, such as equipment and table surfaces, represented a reservoir for the spread of ARGs in the meat processing facility. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Pork MeatRed MeatAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaFood HandlingGenes, BacterialSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceFood processing environmentsMetagenomicsMicrobial ecology

Identifiers

PMID34645520
PMCPMC8515711
OpenAlexW3205457437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.