Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34443459›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Concise Review of Current In Vitro Chemical and Cell-Based Antioxidant Assay Methods.

Ifeanyi D Nwachukwu, Roghayeh Amini Sarteshnizi, Chibuike C Udenigwe, Rotimi E Aluko

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deciphering the Bioactive Landscape ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Preparation and Investigation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antioxidant potential and genomic adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ifeanyi D NwachukwuSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8279-2392
Roghayeh Amini SarteshniziSchool of Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-8972
Chibuike C UdenigweSchool of Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8802-7707
Rotimi E AlukoDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9025-2513
Loma Linda University · USTarbiat Modares University · IRUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN 2018-06019Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN 2018-06839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antioxidants remain interesting molecules of choice for suppression of the toxic effects of free radicals in foods and human systems. The current practice involves the use of mainly synthetic molecules as potent antioxidant agents. However, due to the potential negative impact on human health, there is an intensive effort within the research community to develop natural alternatives with similar antioxidant efficacy but without the negative side effects of synthetic molecules. Still, the successful development of new molecules depends on the use of reliable chemical or cell culture assays to screen antioxidant properties. Chemical antioxidant assays include the determination of scavenging ability against free radicals such as DPPH, superoxide anion radicals, hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and nitric oxide. Other antioxidant tests include the ability of compounds to bind and sequester prooxidant metal cations, reduce ferric iron, and attenuate the rate of lipid oxidation. Ex vivo tests utilize cell cultures to confirm entry of the molecules into cells and the ability to quench synthetic intracellular free radicals or to stimulate the increased biosynthesis of endogenous antioxidants. In order to assist researchers in their choice of antioxidant evaluation methods, this review presents background scientific information on some of the most commonly used antioxidant assays with a comparative discussion of the relevance of published literature data to food science and human nutrition applications.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsBiological AssayCell MembraneCellsHumansLipid PeroxidationReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntioxidantsReactive Oxygen Speciesantioxidant assayscell culturefree radicalslipid peroxidationradical scavengingreactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID34443459
PMCPMC8400447
OpenAlexW3194078993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.