ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2021
Pathogenic bacteria in cheese, raw and pasteurised milk.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Characterisation and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Listeria monocytogenes From Dairy Sources.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Cheese and Its Microbes Under the Light of One Health-A Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Insights into spatial dynamics of the microbiome and resistome across the conventional and organic dairy farms.PloS one · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Abundance of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (Including Virulence Gene Profiles) and Heavy Metal Contamination in Camel Milk.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Diversity and antibiotic resistance of cultivable bacteria in bulk tank milk from dairy farms in Shandong Province, China.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Microbiological Evaluation of Two Mexican Artisanal Cheeses: Analysis of Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria in Cotija Cheese and Bola de Ocosingo Cheese by qPCR.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of some essential oils against zoonotic methicillin-resistantJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- Kinship analysis ofVeterinary world · 2024Article
- Article
- Pathogenic bacteria in cheese, raw and pasteurised milk.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoodborne diseases, especially those transmitted by milk and its products, are worldwide problem. Milk is not only a complete food but also a unique medium for activating various bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhi. In recent years, numerous bacteria with multiple drug resistance patterns have appeared, and there have been many problems in infection control. Today, ranchers use antibiotics for control of the animal disease, and humans are constantly using animal products containing antibiotics.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the contamination status of raw and pasteurised milk as well as local cheese and to find a rapid Multiplex PCR method for investigation of contamination. Determination of antibiotic resistant isolates is also desirable. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred samples were collected from livestock and retail outlets using culture and molecular methods to identify S. aureus, L. monocytogenes and S. typhi. The antibiotic resistance pattern was determined for the isolates.
resultsIn this study, culture results for 100 samples showed 10% S. aureus isolates while no cases of S. typhi and L. monocytogenes were detected. In real-time qPCR, S. aureus was isolated in 60% (n = 60) of samples, S. typhi in 53% (n = 53) and L. monocytogenes in 2% (n = 2). The results of sensitivity and specificity of Multiplex PCR for the three studied bacteria indicated general specificity of 72% and sensitivity of 80%.
conclusionBased on the results of this study, it can be concluded that S. typhi, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus are more likely to be detected by real-time qPCR because of the high sensitivity of this test to culture. Multiplex method was not reliable in this study and cannot be suggested for rapid diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.