ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2021
The Mystery Dinner RCA: Using Gamification and Simulation to Teach Root Cause Analysis.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The power of play-based learning: evaluating the impact of collaborative gamified quizzing on medical students' learning through the lens of Kirkpatrick's framework.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- From Pieces to Processes: Teaching Health Care Process Optimization and Quality Improvement Through a Building Brick Simulation.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Gamification of Critical Care Medical Education: ICUlympics.ATS scholar · 2025Article
- A Gamified Cardiometabolic Health Curriculum Utilizing a Student Response System for Internal Medicine Residents.Cureus · 2025Article
- Billing Bonanza: Improving Resident Knowledge of the 2021 Revised American Medical Association Outpatient Billing Guidelines Through Gamification.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a widely utilized tool for investigating systems issues that lead to patient safety events and near misses, yet only 38% of learners participate in an interdisciplinary patient safety investigation during training. Common barriers to RCA education and participation include faculty time and materials, trainee time constraints, and learner engagement. Methods: We developed a simulated RCA workshop to be taught to a mix of medical and surgical specialties from over 11 GME programs and to third-year medical students. The workshop was a single 90-minute session formatted as a gamified mystery dinner including characters and sequentially revealed clues to promote engagement. Participant satisfaction and subjective knowledge, skills, and attitudes were assessed with a pre/post survey. Results: The workshop was completed by 134 learners between October 2018 and October 2019. The short workshop duration and premade simulation allowed a small number of faculty to train a wide variety of learners in various educational settings. Participants' presurvey (124 out of 134, 92%) versus postsurvey (113 out of 134, 84%) responses showed that attitudes about RCA were statistically improved across all domains queried, with an average effect size of 0.6 (moderate effect); 91% of participants would recommend this course to a colleague. Discussion: A 90-minute, gamified, simulated RCA workshop was taught to medical students and multiple GME specialties with subjective improvements in patient safety attitudes and knowledge while alleviating faculty time constraints in case development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.