Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209352›Full record

ReviewToxics2021

A Review of Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Humans.

Clara Amalie Gade Timmermann, Signe Sonne Mølck, Manik Kadawathagedara, Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard, Margareta Törnqvist, Anne Lise Brantsæter, Marie Pedersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The impact of dietary nitrates and acrylamide intake on systemic redox status in healthy young adults.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clara Amalie Gade TimmermannDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1356 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Signe Sonne MølckDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1356 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Manik KadawathagedaraInserm, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail, 35000 Rennes, France.
Anne Ahrendt BjerregaardCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0628-5292
Margareta TörnqvistDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Anne Lise BrantsæterDepartment of Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0213 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-7134
Marie PedersenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1356 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

European Research Council 758151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dietary intake of acrylamide (AA) is a health concern, and food is being monitored worldwide, but the extent of AA exposure from the diet is uncertain. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of estimated dietary intake. We performed a PubMed search identifying studies that used dietary questionnaires and recalls to estimate total dietary AA intake. A total of 101 studies were included, corresponding to 68 original study populations from 26 countries. Questionnaires were used in 57 studies, dietary recalls were used in 33 studies, and 11 studies used both methods. The estimated median AA intake ranged from 0.02 to 1.53 μg/kg body weight/day between studies. Children were represented in 25 studies, and the body-weight-adjusted estimated AA intake was up to three times higher for children than adults. The majority of studies were from Europe (

Indexed as

acrylamidechildrendietepidemiological studieshumanssurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34209352
PMCPMC8309717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.