Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208019›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Live Cell Assays for the Assessment of Antioxidant Activities of Plant Extracts.

Christophe Furger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tart Cherry (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Quercitrin, the primary active ingredient ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Pinaceae Species.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cellular Antioxidant Properties ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christophe FurgerAnti Oxidant Power AOP/MH2F-LAAS/CNRS, 7 Avenue du Colonel Roche, BP 54200, 31031 Toulouse, France.
Laboratoire d'Analyse et d'Architecture des Systèmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant extracts and pharmacopoeias represent an exceptional breeding ground for the discovery of new antioxidants. Until recently, the antioxidant activity was only measured by chemical hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and single-electron transfer (SET) cell-free assays that do not inform about the actual effect of antioxidants in living systems. By providing information about the mode of action of antioxidants at the subcellular level, recently developed live cell assays are now changing the game. The idea of this review is to present the different cell-based approaches allowing a quantitative measurement of antioxidant effects of plant extracts. Up to date, only four different approaches have reached a certain degree of standardization: (1) the catalase-like assay using H

Indexed as

biosensorcell-based assaysdetection methodfluorescencefree radicalslive cell assaysoxidative stresspharmacopoeiaplant extractsROS

Identifiers

PMID34208019
PMCPMC8230623
OpenAlexW3169332077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.