Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34107926›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Distance education during COVID 19: an Italian survey on the university teachers' perspectives and their emotional conditions.

Massimo Casacchia, Maria Grazia Cifone, Laura Giusti, Leila Fabiani, Roberto Gatto, Loreto Lancia, Benedetta Cinque, Cristina Petrucci, Mario Giannoni, Rodolfo Ippoliti and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Massimo CasacchiaDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Maria Grazia CifoneDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Laura GiustiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Leila FabianiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Roberto GattoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Loreto LanciaDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Benedetta CinqueDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Cristina PetrucciDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Mario GiannoniDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Rodolfo IppolitiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Anna Rita FrattaroliDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Guido MacchiarelliDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Rita RonconeDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. rita.roncone@univaq.it.
University of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the COVID-19 pandemic, distance education (DE) replaced traditional "face-to-face" teaching and has become the main method of teaching. The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the impact of DE by teachers in our department during the second semester of the 2019-20 academic year following the March-May 2020 Italian national lockdown and 2) evaluate the relationship between DE and the emotional well-being of teachers during the period of home confinement.

methodsNinety-seven university teachers (51.5% women; most represented age group 60-69 years range, 40.2%) responded to an anonymous online cross-sectional survey between July 15 - September 30, 2020, on the advantages and disadvantages of DE, developed by one online teacher focus group. The emotional conditions were assessed by a short version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). The internal consistency reliability survey and the 10-item BDI-II were measured by Cronbach's alpha. A correlation analysis (r-Pearson) was conducted between the overall evaluation of the experience of DE and the variables included in the study.

resultsTeachers reported difficulties in technical aspects, and in psychological factors, as the discomfort of "speaking in the void" (64.7%). The absence of "face-to-face" eye contact with the students was complained by 81% of teachers. Significant impairments in sleep patterns and loss of energy were reported, with female teachers having greater difficulty concentrating than their male colleagues. A quarter of teachers showed depressive symptoms of varying severity. The most satisfied teachers were those most stimulated by DE (r = 0.752, p < 0.000), who showed a lower impact of depressive symptoms (r = - 0.289, p = 0.005). The teaching load in hours influenced the perception of disadvantages (r = 0.214, p = 0.035) and contributed to a lower appreciation of the challenges of DE. The more significant the manifestation of depressive symptoms during the lockdown was, the greater the subjective recovery of a good emotional condition once the domestic confinement was over (r = 0.344, p = 0.001), despite maintaining DE.

conclusionsOur study highlights the impact of technical, didactic, and psychological difficulties of DE, reported by our teachers. The appreciation of their new learning promoted by DE seemed related to better emotional well-being of university teachers accepting this "challenge" in their important role in the high-education system, influencing good learning and promoting students' professional success.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceAdultCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMalePandemicsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2UniversitiesCOVID-19 pandemicDistance educationMedical coursesUniversityUniversity teachers

Identifiers

PMID34107926
PMCPMC8187887
OpenAlexW3168426073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.