Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34089340›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2022

Development of a multinational, multidisciplinary competency framework for physiotherapy training in pessary management: an E-Delphi study.

Patricia B Neumann, Nada Radi, Tamara Lynn Gerdis, Clee Tonkin, Chenaye Wright, K Jane Chalmers, Irena Nurkic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia B NeumannAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, City East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. trish.neumann@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3066-5666
Nada RadiCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
Tamara Lynn GerdisCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
Clee TonkinCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
Chenaye WrightCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
K Jane ChalmersSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia.
Irena NurkicCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
Curtin University · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisVaginal support pessaries are intravaginal devices designed to relieve symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, but they can cause serious medical complications if not managed well. Physiotherapists are well placed to manage pessaries, but there are no guidelines on the training required for competency in pessary management (PM).

methodsA scoping review of current literature on PM training was conducted to develop draft competency standards, which were reviewed by a multidisciplinary focus group. Using e-Delphi methodology, a multidisciplinary and multinational expert panel then refined the standards. Three rounds of e-Delphi online surveys were conducted, with individual participant feedback and one videoconference to discuss items that did not reach consensus. Consensus was set at 80% agreement and stability measured using kappa coefficient.

resultsPessary training competency standards, developed by 29 experts, covered three key domains including: (1) prerequisite knowledge and understanding; (2) entrustable professional activities; (3) pessary-specific standards under ten key roles. Consensus was reached on all 73 (100%) competency standards and stability demonstrated for 95.9% of standards. There was no attrition of expert panel participants through the e-Delphi rounds.

conclusionsThis e-Delphi study provides the first, robust recommendations on training standards for physiotherapists in PM. These competency standards will provide clinicians with a self-assessment tool, and educators and training institutions with a benchmark in training for PM, which should improve options and reduce risk for women with prolapse being managed with a pessary.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePessariesConsensusDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesCompetencyDelphi methodPelvic healthPhysiotherapyTrainingVaginal support Pessary

Identifiers

PMID34089340
OpenAlexW3164836608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.