Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970536›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2021

Metagenomic analysis and antimicrobial activity of two fermented milk kefir samples.

Silvia Tenorio-Salgado, Hugo G Castelán-Sánchez, Sonia Dávila-Ramos, Alejandro Huerta-Saquero, Sergio Rodríguez-Morales, Enrique Merino-Pérez, Luis Fernando Roa de la Fuente, Sara E Solis-Pereira, Ernesto Pérez-Rueda, Gabriel Lizama-Uc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative metatranscriptome analysis of Brazilian milk and water kefir beverages.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia Tenorio-SalgadoTecnológico Nacional de México/IT Mérida, Mérida, México.
Hugo G Castelán-SánchezCentro de Investigación en Dinámica Celular, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4763-0267
Sonia Dávila-RamosCentro de Investigación en Dinámica Celular, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, México.
Alejandro Huerta-SaqueroCentro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, Ensenada, México.
Sergio Rodríguez-MoralesUnidad de Química-Sisal, Facultad de Química UNAM, UMDI-Sisal, Sisal, México.
Enrique Merino-PérezDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Biotecnologıa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Cuernavaca, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-0640
Luis Fernando Roa de la FuenteCentro de Investigación de Ciencia y Tecnología Aplicada de Tabasco, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Tabasco, México.
Sara E Solis-PereiraTecnológico Nacional de México/IT Mérida, Mérida, México.
Ernesto Pérez-RuedaInstituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, UNAM, Unidad Académica Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Gabriel Lizama-UcTecnológico Nacional de México/IT Mérida, Mérida, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0092-3636
Instituto Tecnológico de Mérida · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MXInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia · ESSecretaría de Investigación, Innovación y Educación Superior · MXUniversidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the fermented milk product kefir has been intensively studied because of its health benefits. Here, we evaluated the microbial consortia of two kefir samples, from Escarcega, Campeche, and Campeche (México). We considered a functional comparison between both samples, including fungal and bacterial inhibition; second, we applied shotgun metagenomics to assess the structure and functional diversity of the communities of microorganisms. These two samples exhibited antagonisms against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Bioactive polyketides and nonribosomal peptides were identified by LC-HRMS analysis. We also observed a high bacterial diversity and an abundance of Actinobacteria in both kefir samples, and a greater abundance of Saccharomyces species in kefir of Escarcega than in the Campeche kefir. When the prophage compositions were evaluated, the Campeche sample showed a higher diversity of prophage sequences. In Escarcega, we observed a prevalence of prophage families that infect Enterobacteria and Lactobacillus. The sequences associated with secondary metabolites, such as plipastatin, fengycin, and bacillaene, and also bacteriocins like helveticin and zoocin, were also found in different proportions, with greater diversity in the Escarcega sample. The analyses described in this work open the opportunity to understand the microbial diversity in kefir samples from two distant localities.

Indexed as

MetagenomeAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriaBiodiversityCultured Milk ProductsDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalFermentationFood MicrobiologyFungiKefirMetagenomicsMexicoMicrobiotaMilkAnti-Infective AgentsDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalPeptidesPolyketidesfermented milkkefirmetagenomicsmicrobiomeprophage sequencessecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID33970536
PMCPMC8103080
OpenAlexW3162055218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.